microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Allow type narrowing to be specified as always-on or always-off
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 117
Descripción
🔍 Search Terms
type narrowing of functions, asserts on getters
✅ Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
⭐ Suggestion
Right now, properties of objects can always be narrowed, whereas functions can never be narrowed. As a developer, I would like to specify when functions can be narrowed, and when object properties can't be narrowed.
📃 Motivating Example
Consider this example:
export const model = {
get value() {
return Math.random() > 0.5 ? 'Hello' : undefined
},
getValue() {
return model.value
}
}
if (model.value) {
console.log(model.value.toLowerCase())
}
if (model.getValue()) {
console.log(model.getValue().toLowerCase())
}
In the TypeScript playground, you can see that even though these code paths are identical in terms of output and function calls, one is narrowed and one is not. TypeScript always assumes that properties are always stable in their values between calls, and assumes that functions are always in-stable in their calls.
You can see this in the TypeScript error which does not error for the property, even though it should.
💻 Use Cases
- What do you want to use this for?
I'm more concerned with the stable function case than the instable property object case. I'm building a Knockout-like observable library that lays on top of Vue. It works fine / perfectly in the Vue ecosystem, however it's TypeScript that doesn't behave here. foo.value is always type-narrowed, whereas foo() is never type-narrowed, even though I can guarantee its stability between calls. Because this behavior in TypeScript is automatic (as far as I know?), there's no way to specify which function calls are stable (and can be narrowed) and which ones are not.
- What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
You can type narrow by assigning the returned value of the function to another variable. However, in Vue, this approach is limited when binding to templates, where v-if will not type-narrow a functional getter.
- What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
A very clumsy workaround is using a Vue computed(), which then also type-narrows.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza con el ejemplo del playground de TypeScript y reproduce el comportamiento diferente del estrechamiento de tipos para model.value y model.getValue(). Lee el comportamiento existente del estrechamiento de tipos y, después, define y valida un mecanismo opt-in u opt-out para llamadas de función estables y propiedades de objetos; se considera terminado cuando los casos solicitados se estrechan de forma consistente sin cambiar la salida en tiempo de ejecución de JavaScript.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- javascript, typescript
- Área
- compilers
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 28/100