microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Allow type narrowing to be specified as always-on or always-off
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 19 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 117
Beschreibung
🔍 Search Terms
type narrowing of functions, asserts on getters
✅ Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
⭐ Suggestion
Right now, properties of objects can always be narrowed, whereas functions can never be narrowed. As a developer, I would like to specify when functions can be narrowed, and when object properties can't be narrowed.
📃 Motivating Example
Consider this example:
export const model = {
get value() {
return Math.random() > 0.5 ? 'Hello' : undefined
},
getValue() {
return model.value
}
}
if (model.value) {
console.log(model.value.toLowerCase())
}
if (model.getValue()) {
console.log(model.getValue().toLowerCase())
}
In the TypeScript playground, you can see that even though these code paths are identical in terms of output and function calls, one is narrowed and one is not. TypeScript always assumes that properties are always stable in their values between calls, and assumes that functions are always in-stable in their calls.
You can see this in the TypeScript error which does not error for the property, even though it should.
💻 Use Cases
- What do you want to use this for?
I'm more concerned with the stable function case than the instable property object case. I'm building a Knockout-like observable library that lays on top of Vue. It works fine / perfectly in the Vue ecosystem, however it's TypeScript that doesn't behave here. foo.value is always type-narrowed, whereas foo() is never type-narrowed, even though I can guarantee its stability between calls. Because this behavior in TypeScript is automatic (as far as I know?), there's no way to specify which function calls are stable (and can be narrowed) and which ones are not.
- What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
You can type narrow by assigning the returned value of the function to another variable. However, in Vue, this approach is limited when binding to templates, where v-if will not type-narrow a functional getter.
- What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
A very clumsy workaround is using a Vue computed(), which then also type-narrows.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit dem TypeScript-Playground-Beispiel und reproduziere das unterschiedliche Verhalten bei der Typverengung für model.value und model.getValue(). Lies das bestehende Verhalten bei der Typverengung und definiere und validiere anschließend einen Opt-in- oder Opt-out-Mechanismus für stabile Funktionsaufrufe und Objekteigenschaften; abgeschlossen ist die Aufgabe, wenn die angeforderten Fälle konsistent verengt werden, ohne die JavaScript-Laufzeitausgabe zu ändern.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- javascript, typescript
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 28/100