microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Need some way to propagate optional fields from `satisfies` to type it is used on

オープン
#54,976 コメント 0 件 リアクション 1 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
主要言語
Go
スター
111k
フォーク
14.4k
平均マージ
1日 19時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
117

説明

Suggestion

Give some way to do satisfies-like check checking for type with optional properties and modyfy left-handside type of the check to make these prperties available for access with type never.

Solution 1

Use extends keyword similar to satisfies, but with propagating optional fields with type never to computed type it is used on:

import type { Equal, Expect } from '@type-challenges/utils'

const obj1 = { a: 1, c: 3 } as const   satisfies   Partial<Record<"a" | "b" | "c", number>>;
const obj2 = { a: 1, c: 3 } as const    extends    Partial<Record<"a" | "b" | "c", number>>;
//                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^

type cases = [
  Expect<Equal<typeof obj1, {
    readonly a: 1;
    readonly c: 3;
  }>>,
  Expect<Equal<typeof obj2, {
    readonly a: 1,
    readonly b: never, // <<<<<<<<
    readonly c: 3,
  }>>,
]

Solution 2

Introduce new special type missing that is equvalent of optional never but without appearing in keyof and make satisfies set this type to missing optional properties and propagete it on type it is used on.

import type { Equal, Expect } from '@type-challenges/utils'

const obj = { a: 1, c: 3 } as const satisfies Partial<Record<"a" | "b" | "c", number>>;

type cases = [
  Expect<Equal<typeof obj, {
    readonly a: 1;
    readonly b: missing,
    readonly c: 3;
  }>>,
  Expect<Equal<keyof typeof obj, "a" | "c">>,
  Expect<Equal<keyof { x: number; y: missing }, "x">>,
  Expect<Equal<keyof { x: number; y: never }, "x" | "y">>,
]

const smth1: { x: number, y: missing } = { x: 0 } // Fine
const smth2: { x: number, y?: never } = { x: 0 } // Fine
const smth3: { x: number, y: never } = { x: 0 } // Currently an error

By the way, this type may be useful in many other cases.

🔍 Search Terms

satisfies Partial never

✅ Viability Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

⭐ Suggestion

When I use satisfies I actually expect that I can use on an object all kinds of property access that were available on type I'm using for the assertion. However I came up to a situation where I can't. At first I thought it's a bug, but then I realized that "fixing" it will break keyof functionality, so I desided that it would be incorrect to modify satisfies behaviour, so I suggest to use another keyword for this functionality.

Playground

type SomeKeys = "a" | "b" | "c"

type Smth = Partial<Record<SomeKeys, number>>

const obj1 = { a: 1, c: 3 } as const satisfies Smth;

const obj2 = { a: 1, c: 3 } as {
  readonly a: 1,
  readonly b: never,
  readonly c: 3,
} satisfies Smth;

const keys: SomeKeys[] = ["a", "b", "c"]

function f(x: Smth) {
  console.log(keys.map(key => x[key])); // Fine
}

f(obj1); // Fine
console.log(keys.map(key => obj1[key])); // Error

f(obj2); // Fine
console.log(keys.map(key => obj2[key])); // Fine

type K1 = keyof typeof obj1 // Fine: "a" | "c"
type K2 = keyof typeof obj2 // Oops: "a" | "b" | "c"

satisfies Smth on obj1 checkes that key b can be used to index it, anyway as type of obj1 doesn't include key b the code doesn'ty compile with

Element implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'SomeKeys' can't be used to index type '{ readonly a: 1; readonly c: 3; }'.
Property 'b' does not exist on type '{ readonly a: 1; readonly c: 3; }'.(7053)

📃 Motivating Example

In this example it's possible to use type normally without satisfies but I didn't want to overcomplicate an example. I hope it's idea is clear.

Playground

import React from 'react'

type Pages = "home" | "search" | "news" | "profile"

const pages: Pages[] = ["home", "search", "news"]

interface User {
  name: string;
  isRegistered: boolean;
  canSearch: boolean;
}

const canOpenPage = { // Not listed pages are available for everyone
  profile: user => user.isRegistered,
  search: user => user.canSearch,
} as const satisfies Partial<Record<Pages, (user: User) => boolean>>;

function Navigation({ currentUser }: { currentUser: User }) {
  return (
    <nav>
      {pages.map(page => canOpenPage[page]?.(currentUser) === false || (
        <a href={`/${encodeURIComponent(page)}`}>{page}</a>)
      )}
    </nav>
  )
}

Should not have error

Element implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'Pages' can't be used to index type '{ readonly profile: (user: User) => boolean; readonly search: (user: User) => boolean; }'.
Property 'home' does not exist on type '{ readonly profile: (user: User) => boolean; readonly search: (user: User) => boolean; }'.

💻 Use Cases

Usages with Partial<Record<...>> and keys enumeration seem the most likely for me.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

この Issue ではリポジトリのファイルやテストが指定されていません。リンクされた TypeScript Playgrounds で satisfiesPartial<Record<...>> の例を再現し、その後、インデックスアクセスと keyof に対する type-checker の挙動を追跡してください。提案されたオプショナルフィールドの挙動について承認済みの設計と実装があり、ドキュメント化された例をカバーするリグレッションテストが含まれていれば完了です。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
typescript
領域
compilers
issue の種類
機能追加
難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
活発さ
停滞
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
30/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。