microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Resolve deferred conditional types to their `true` branch when instantiated with a type parameter constrained to the tested type
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 19 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 117
Beschreibung
Bug Report
🔎 Search Terms
conditional-type, distributive-type, generics
🕗 Version & Regression Information
Version 4.9.4 and nightly
⏯ Playground Link
TS resolves type to different type even if I add constraint that should resolve to given type
💻 Code
type PrimitiveDataType = string | number | bigint | boolean | symbol | undefined | null;
type ConditionalType<T> = [T] extends [PrimitiveDataType]
? (v: T) => void
: T extends Array<unknown>
? (v: T, t: number) => void
: never;
abstract class AbstractClass<T> {
abstract value: T;
protected conditionalFunctions: Map<ConditionalType<T>, number | undefined> = new Map();
}
class SomeClass<T extends PrimitiveDataType> extends AbstractClass<T> {
value: T;
constructor(value: T) {
super();
this.value = value;
}
someMethod() {
for (const someFn of this.conditionalFunctions.keys()) {
someFn(this.value);
}
}
}
In the above code I have created a PrimitiveDataType which is a union of all primitive data types in JavaScript. Then I have created a ConditionalType<T> that will resolve to some callback only if T is one of PrimitiveDataType. Then I have created an abstract generic class that have a field which type(ConditionalType<T>) depends on generic value of this class. In the end, I have crated a SomeClass that extends AbstractClass<T> and add constraints that generic parameter T have to extend PrimitiveDataType.
🙁 Actual behavior
For someMethod of this SomeClass conditionalFunctions.keys() is resolved to (v: T, t: number) => void what would implicate that my generic T extends an Array type.
🙂 Expected behavior
For someMethod of this SomeClass I have expected that TS should resolve conditionalFunctions.keys() to (v: T) => void to my surprise it is resolved to (v: T, t: number) => void what would implicate that my generic T extends an Array type. This doesn't make sens to me because T has constraint that has to extends PrimitiveDataType.
Example of what I would expect:
type PrimitiveDataType = string | number | bigint | boolean | symbol | undefined | null;
type ConditionalType<T> = [T] extends [PrimitiveDataType]
? (v: T) => void
: T extends Array<unknown>
? (v: T, t: number) => void
: never;
const x: PrimitiveDataType = 12;
const y: ConditionalType<typeof x> = (param: number) => undefined;
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit dem verlinkten TypeScript Playground-Repro und vergleiche den generischen SomeClass-Fall mit dem Beispiel der regulären Variable. Untersuche die Instanziierung eines bedingten Typs für einen Typparameter, der auf PrimitiveDataType beschränkt ist. Fertig ist es, wenn der beschränkte Fall ConditionalType zum Callback mit einem Argument statt zum Array-Zweig aufgelöst wird und sich beide Beispiele konsistent verhalten.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- typescript
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 42/100