microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Allow composite values to be used in type predicates

Ouverte
#43,640 2 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
Langage dominant
Go
Étoiles
111k
Forks
14.4k
Merge moyen
1 j 19 h
PR mergées (30 j)
117

Description

Allow composite values to be used in type predicates

🔍 Search Terms

Is, composite type, complex type, composite value, complex value, type predicate, type guard

✅ Viability Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn’t be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn’t change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn’t a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript’s Design Goals.

⭐ Suggestion

Type predicates allow you to define functions that can tell the TypeScript compiler if a parameter is of a certain type.
I suggest that this be extended to allow type predicates to narrow the type of composite objects involving parameters.
That is, the left-hand-side of is types should be allowed to include object literals.

📃 Example

Say you have a type that involves a subset of another type:

type MyType = {property1: "static text", property2: "Hello" | "World"};

A type predicate for this would always require passing in the property1 property, even though it’s unnecessary.
Now, you can create a type predicate that only takes the value of property2, but still gurantees the result type:

function foo(text: string): {property1: "static text", property2: text} is MyType {
    return ["Hello", "World"].includes(text);
};

I’ve run into the problem of being unable to do this while developing my website.
I had a tagged union:

type A = {t: "A", value: "X" | "Y"};
type B = {t: "B", value: string};
type U = A | B;

And I wanted to get a value of type A from user input, but default back to a B type if the value wasn’t
To do this, I hoped to be able to do this:

function zit(x: string): {t: "A", value: x} is A {
    return ["X", "Y"].includes(x);
};
function gob(x: string): U {
    return zit(x) ? {t: "A", value: x} : {t: "B", value: x};
};

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Par oĂč commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela Ă©vite que deux personnes fassent le mĂȘme travail.
  3. Forkez le dépÎt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Piste de recherche

Aucun fichier, test ou point d’entrĂ©e n’est nommĂ©. Commencez par examiner les exemples de prĂ©dicats de type de l’issue et le comportement existant du compilateur concernant les gardes de type ; la modification serait complĂšte lorsque les types d’objet composites seront acceptĂ©s dans les prĂ©dicats et que les scĂ©narios de narrowing prĂ©sentĂ©s fonctionneront sans modifier le JavaScript gĂ©nĂ©rĂ©.

Rédigé par le modÚle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Évaluation

Stack technique
typescript
Domaine
compilers
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Activité
À l'abandon
Clarté
PlutĂŽt claire
Accessibilité débutants
35/100

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.