microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Utility type to reference JSDoc of another type
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 117
Descripción
Search Terms
type level jsdoc
computed jsdoc
reference jsdoc from other type
Suggestion
Add a utility type Docs<T>, which, given type T = U & Docs<V>, results in a type T with the type of U, but with the JSDoc annotations of V (overriding any U might have). This should also add V's go to definition results to T's (maybe prioritized?).
This could either be implemented as a magic type like ThisType (e.g. type Docs<T> = unknown in lib.d.ts), or as an intrinsic type, as introduced in #40580.
Use Cases
This is useful to preserve context when manipulating types (see example below).
Examples
interface Person {
id: string;
/**
* The date this person was born
*/
birthDate: Date;
/**
* The date this person died; `null` indicates that the person is still alive.
*/
deathDate: Date | null;
/**
* This person's age in milliseconds. Calculated as `deathDate - birthDate`
* when dead (`deathDate === null`), `currentDate - birthDate` when not.
*/
age: number;
name: string;
}
const alice: Person = {
id: "12345",
birthDate: new Date(),
deathDate: null,
age: 0,
name: "Alice"
};
alice.deathDate // Hover `deathDate`; we can clearly see what this field means and why it might be null
type Lazy<T> = {
[K in keyof T & string as `get${Capitalize<K>}`]: () => Promise<T[K]>
// Proposed syntax:
// [K in keyof T & string as `get${Capitalize<K>}`]: (() => Promise<T[K]>) & Docs<T[K]>
}
type LazyPerson = Lazy<Person>;
declare const getLazyPerson: (id: string) => LazyPerson;
const bob = getLazyPerson("1111");
bob.getDeathDate // Hover `getDeathDate`; we've lost all information about what this field means. Why could it be null?
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con la declaración propuesta Docs<T> en lib.d.ts y lee el issue #40580 sobre el enfoque de tipo intrínseco. Traza cómo el sistema de tipos y el servicio de lenguaje representan JSDoc y los resultados de go-to-definition; se considera terminado cuando el tipo propuesto conserva la documentación de V y añade sus resultados de definición a T, como se muestra en el ejemplo.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- compilers
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100