microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Disable type checking for node_modules entirely

オープン
#40,426 コメント 73 件 リアクション 171 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
主要言語
Go
スター
111k
フォーク
14.3k
平均マージ
1日 19時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
117

説明

Search Terms

skipLibCheck
node_modules
ignore library
exclude

Suggestion

Either a new option or the existing option skipLibCheck should be able to disable type checking for node_modules.

Use Cases

A library author might have a faulty import or might only provide typescript files for his library and not transpiled code. As a user of this library I want to be able to disable type checking for a library (or all) because I trust this library has been tested enough in other ways.

Another issue where I found a library shipping ts files and causing errors for the user: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/15363

The response at the end is very relevant

I understand that libraries shouldn't publish *.ts files, but sometimes, they just do, and we can't control every other library easily.
I think typescript should not try to apply this kind of setting (here noImplicitAny) to the node_modules simply because it is meant to be applied to the user code being compiled, not the external dependencies.

Originally posted by @victornoel in https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/15363#issuecomment-309459043

Examples

I had the case that a library came with a dist/ folder and almost all types were perfectly arranged in .d.ts files. But one file was making an import from ../index.d.ts(which seems to be for development purposes, the lib main file is dist/index.d.ts) which in turn then imported src/ClassA.ts

The library author used a different tsconfig and didn't use strict type checking, but I do and that's why the type check fails for me, because now the typescript source files of the library author are type checked.

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines (in case of a new option):

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

まず、既存の skipLibCheck の動作と、issue #15363 の関連する議論を確認してください。ユーザーが skipLibCheck または新しいオプションによって node_modules の型チェックを防止でき、生成される JavaScript を変更しないことをもって完了とします。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
typescript
領域
compilers
issue の種類
機能追加
難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
活発さ
停滞
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
25/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。