RegExp literal flag types

Search Terms

RegExp Regex literal flags as const narrowing

Suggestion

This is similar to the proposal for typing named capture groups https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/32098
It would be useful to narrow RegExp literals based on their flags as well. This could be modeled as type parameter(s) as in that proposal, or as a type intersection, which I will use here.

const myRegExp = /hello/y; // has type RegExp & {dotAll: false, global: false, ignoreCase: false, multiline: false, sticky: true, unicode: false, flags: 'y'};

Use Cases

Regular expressions have different behavior when defined with different flags, and functions may have different behavior when they receive them, so they may want to distinguish the flags of a RegExp for overloads or allowed argument values.

Examples

In the standard library, String.prototype.match returns either the first match with its capture groups, or a list of all matches, depending on whether the argument is a global RegExp. This could be modeled as an overload:

match(str: string): RegExpMatchArray|null
match(regexp: RegExp & {global: false}): RegExpMatchArray|null
match(regexp: RegExp & {global: true}): Array<string>|null;
match(regexp: RegExp): RegExpMatchArray|null;

I recently wrote some functions which only work with sticky RegExps, so I had to put checks at the top of each function:

function match(regexp: RegExp) {
    if (!regexp.sticky) { throw new Error("Invalid argument -- RegExp must use the /y 'sticky' flag"); }
   ...
}

match(/sticky example/y); // compiles and runs fine
match(/non-sticky example/); // compiles fine, runtime error

I'd like to define the function instead as:

type StickyRegExp = RegExp & {sticky: true};
function match(regexp: StickyRegExp) {
   ...
}

match(/sticky example/y); // compiles and runs fine
match(/non-sticky example/); // compiler error

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

• This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
• This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

この issue では RegExp リテラルと標準ライブラリの String.prototype.match overloads が挙げられていますが、ファイルやテストは示されていません。まず、RegExp リテラルを処理する compiler の箇所と、match の library definitions を特定してください。完了条件には、typing design の決定、sticky や global などの flags に対する compile-time narrowing、そして示されている例をカバーすることを含めてください。