microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Narrow number literal types with comparison
未关闭
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
In Discussion
Suggestion
- 主要语言
- Go
- 星标
- 111k
- 派生
- 14.3k
- 平均合并
- 2 天 4 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 132
描述
Search Terms
constant number literals narrowing comparison
Suggestion
Narrow number literal type not only with (non)equality, but also with less-than etc.
This request is only about throwing away non-matching literals, and not about full-blown number narrowing.
Use Cases
This could be used to direct narrowing with tuple unions.
Examples
With literals
type X = 0 | 1 | 2 | 3;
function f(): X {
return 1;
}
function g(x: 0 | 3) {
console.log(x);
}
let x: X = f();
g(x); // Error, 1 | 2 is unexpected
if (x > 2) {
g(x); // Same error, but should be safe
}
if (x != 1 && x != 2) {
g(x); // Ok
}
With tuples
type X = [] | [string, string];
function f(): X { return [];}
function g(x: string) {
console.log(x);
}
let x: X = f();
g(x[0]); // Error, undefined is unexpected
if (x.length > 0) {
g(x[0]); // Error, but should be ok
}
if (x.length == 2) {
g(x[0]); // Ok
}
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 issue 中的字面量和元组示例开始,重现它们当前的诊断信息和 narrowing 行为。定义比较检查的预期控制流结果,包括小于比较和元组长度比较,并验证此更改只会移除不可能的字面量情况,而不会引入通用的数字 narrowing。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- typescript
- 领域
- compilers
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100