Import type over generic argument

Search Terms

import type, generic, module string type

Suggestion

To allow for giving a generic argument as an import() type's argument, something like
function <Mod extends string>(obj: unknown, modPath: Mod): obj is import(Mod);

Use Cases

Would allow generic functions that type inference from any module path string literal to the type exported by that module. This is helpful for encapsulating good module loading practices. For instance, in a large AMD application I work on, we need to manage the application footprint by not loading modules that aren't needed for the current execution path. There are a number of utility functions we could write around handling modules to support good behavior on this front.

Examples

One of the signatures of AMD's require() could be typed as:
function require<Mod extends string>(path: Mod): import(Mod);
This actually does work today if that declaration is put in a .d.ts file and skipLibCheck is set to true. If a string literal is passed, the return type is inferred from the path; if non-literal, the return type is any. In fact, if this worked but disallowed anything other than a module path, it would be super handy for typo avoidance. I'm pretty sure what's happening now is accidental, though, since any more complex use yields a "string literal expected" error on the import type.

Likewise, I'm pretty sure a really useful signature for define() could be done with a mapped type and tuple typed-rest params, something like:

type ImportsOf<Paths extends string[]> = { P in keyof Paths: import(Paths[P]) };
function define<Paths extends string[]>(paths: Paths, callback: (...args: ImportsOf<Paths>)=>void);

Specifically, the function I wanted to write with this was a type-narrowing instanceof check over a module path. Given a module that exports a constructor:

function isModuleInstance<Mod extends string>(obj: unknown, path: Mod): obj is InstanceType<import(Mod)> {
    const modValue = require(path);
    return modValue && obj instanceof modValue
}

If the module for a constructor hasn't been loaded, we can assume no object has been constructed by it, so this technique is very handy for keeping down the module load footprint in applications with lots of modules.

A question for discussion would be the value of an import-type on a non-literal argument, or a non-module argument for that matter. My initial impression is if the import() type can't be resolved, it should evaluate to never and produce an error just like import('some_garbage_string_i_made_up')". That might require the type checker to be given a stricter bound than "extends string", though. If necessary, a user-visible built-in type that means "a string representing a known module" seems like it might be useful in lots of contexts.

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

• [X ] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• [X ] This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• [X ] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• [X ] This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
• [Seems like it to me] This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

まず、skipLibCheckを有効にした.d.tsファイルで、リテラルおよび非リテラルのモジュールパスを含む汎用的なimport()の例を再現します。現在の動作を要求されたシグネチャと比較し、解決できない引数やモジュールではない引数に対してどうするべきかを定義します。想定されるケースが期待される推論型で受け入れられ、無効なケースが引き続き適切に診断されれば完了です。