microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Generic enumerated type parameter narrowing (conditional types)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 4 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 132
Descripción
Search Terms
conditional type inference enum enumerated narrowing branching generic parameter type guard
Suggestion
Improve inference / narrowing for a generic type parameter and a related conditional type.
I saw another closed-wontfix issue requesting generic parameter type guards, but a type guard should not be necessary for this case, since the possible values for the generic are enumerated.
Use Cases
(Names have been changed and simplified)
I have a method that takes a KeyType (enumerated) and a KeyValue with type conditionally based on the enumerated KeyType.
Depending on the KeyType value, the code calls method(s) specific to that type.
The TS compiler is unable to tell that after I have checked the enumerated KeyType, the type of the KeyValue (string, number, etc) is known and should be able to be passed to a function that only accepts that specific KeyValue type.
Examples
const enum TypeEnum {
String = "string",
Number = "number",
Tuple = "tuple"
}
// The issue also occurs with
// type TypeEnum = "string" | "number" | "tuple"
interface KeyTuple { key1: string; key2: number; }
type KeyForTypeEnum<T extends TypeEnum>
= T extends TypeEnum.String ? string
: T extends TypeEnum.Number ? number
: T extends TypeEnum.Tuple ? KeyTuple
: never;
class DoSomethingWithKeys {
doSomethingSwitch<TType extends TypeEnum>(type: TType, key: KeyForTypeEnum<TType>) {
switch (type) {
case TypeEnum.String: {
this.doSomethingWithString(key);
break;
}
case TypeEnum.Number: {
this.doSomethingWithNumber(key);
break;
}
case TypeEnum.Tuple: {
this.doSomethingWithTuple(key);
break;
}
}
}
doSomethingIf<TType extends TypeEnum>(type: TType, key: KeyForTypeEnum<TType>) {
if (type === TypeEnum.String) {
this.doSomethingWithString(key);
}
else if (type === TypeEnum.Number) {
this.doSomethingWithNumber(key);
}
else if (type === TypeEnum.Tuple) {
this.doSomethingWithTuple(key);
}
}
private doSomethingWithString(key: string) {
}
private doSomethingWithNumber(key: number) {
}
private doSomethingWithTuple(key: KeyTuple) {
}
}
This should compile without errors if TS was able to tell that the switch statements or equality checks limited the possible type of the other property.
I lose a lot of the benefits of TS if I have to cast the value to something else. especially if I have to cast as any as KeyForTypeEnum<TType> as has happened in my current codebase.
If I'm doing something wrong or if there's already a way to handle this, please let me know.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
[X] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript / JavaScript code
[X] This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
[X] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
[X] This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. new expression-level syntax)
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza reproduciendo el ejemplo proporcionado de tipo condicional genérico y localiza las pruebas existentes del compilador de TypeScript para el narrowing genérico y los tipos condicionales; la issue no especifica archivos ni pruebas concretos. Se considera terminado cuando ramas equivalentes de switch y de comprobación de igualdad compilen sin casts y preserven el comportamiento existente.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- compilers
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 28/100