microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Multiple UMD typings in one file.d.ts
まだ誰も着手していません。
- 主要言語
- Go
- スター
- 111k
- フォーク
- 14.4k
- 平均マージ
- 1日 19時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 117
説明
TypeScript Version: 2.4.1
[1] Simplistic scenario: I am Facebook and I want to ship typings for both @types/react and @types/react-dom in one file.
Currently those are 2 files, and they use UMD typings with export as namespace. You can:
- either move them to be non-script module-only with multiple
declare module "react",declare module "react-dom"; - or make them both scripts with
declare namespace React,declare namespace ReactDOMinside.
[2] Another more realistic scenario: plugins/extensions.
I am GitHub and I want to enable extensions to my shiny new GitHub Desktop (Electron) app. I want to ship a bundled EverythingYouNeed.d.ts file, embedding typings for the specific React version, for the specific RX version, and of course GitHub-specific APIs and extension points' typings.
At runtime I load React, ReactDOM, RX and bunch of GitHub APIs on global — so technically I can manually edit 3rd party typings from UMD style to namespaced style, before bundling them together. Extensions will just take everything off global. But it's a lot of fiddly work over external assets (DTS). Maintenance cost is high.
[3] My actual realistic scenario is similar to GitHub one above, but in a corporate environment. I am preparing a tooling for the individual departments to use as a base for creating HTML apps. I want it to be as bundled and blackboxed as possible. Specific 3rd party libraries, specific versions etc.
As much as I can bundle JS, HTML and CSS and even compress, currently I am forced either to distribute a large number of individual decl.d.ts, or hand-edit those to allow bundling together.
For the interest of disclosure, currently I partially process external DTS files with RegExes, and partially manually edit to fit them in the bundle. Quite embarrassing!
Suggestion
Two things:
- Export specific module as a specific namespace
- Module-aware syntax in non-module files
Exporting specific module as namespace
react-bundled.d.ts
declare module "react" {
// declarations for React stuff...
}
export module "react" as namespace React; <-- see export specific module
declare module "react-dom" {
// declarations for ReactDOM stuff...
}
export module "react-dom" as namespace ReactDOM; <-- see export specific module
Module-aware syntax in scripts
react-bundle-maker.ts
declare import * as React from "react";
declare import * as ReactDOM from "react-dom";
I tell the compiler: consider typings for module X imported by the external forces. Now let me just use it.
And if I run that react-bundle-maker.ts file from above through tsc --declaration, I expect to get the same output as react-bundled.d.ts above.
Why these suggestions
These two suggestions (with possible tweaks etc.) avoid dilemmas and problems of various kinds of loaders and bundlers as discussed in 4433 Bundling TS module type definitions, 6319 Support 'target':'es5' with 'module':'es6' and 4434 Bundling TS modules.
External loaders are dealing OK with runtime loading, but TS needs to improve its story on compile-time with modules — particularly in case of bundling for a large app scenario.
One specific hole I didn't want to dig is specifying the 'root' module for bundling. Ability to use declare import in scripts solves that neatly.
If we allow features I suggested, or something other to that effect, we'll have much smoother bundling workflow for DTS files.
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
調査の方向性
まず、提案されている export module ... as namespace および declare import 構文を確認し、続いて既存のバンドリング上の制約について関連する issue 4433、6319、4434 を読んでください。完了には、複数の UMD typings とモジュール対応構文に対する合意されたアプローチに加え、それに対応するコンパイラ実装と検証が必要です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- typescript
- 領域
- compilers
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 28/100