Viability of using RCLCPP as the client library for low resource arm based linux systems

• Hardware description: NI Roborio (armv7 softfp, with 256mb ram)
• RTOS: linux kernel with real-time scheduler patch
• Installation type: micro_ros_setup to build static library for platform
• Version or commit hash: galactic

Hi, I have a question about the viability of using RCLCPP in place of RCLC for low power / resource constrained arm systems. So far I have a working version of micro_ros for the platform, as well as a working colcon.meta and toolchain, but was curious if it would be possible to use RCLCPP as the client library for the micro_ros client. Given our use case is already C++ on the device, using RCLCPP seems to be a better fit. Especially rather than than having to write a significant wrapper around RCLC. Would this switch even be possible, or are the two client libraries functionally different enough to a point where it would not work? Thank you for your help! (Sorry if this is the wrong place to pose this question)

审查 micro_ros_setup 的 Galactic 构建配置，包括报告中的 colcon.meta 和 toolchain，并比较 NI Roborio armv7 softfp 目标对 RCLCPP 和 RCLC 的支持方式。该 issue 未指明源文件或测试；完成这项工作需要明确的可行性判断，以及确定的实现或配置路径。