massive-com / massive-com/client-python

Possible missing 1-minute aggregates: MMM and HON (Stocks Basic)

Aperta
#1,028 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
1.5k
Fork
362
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Descrizione

Hello Massive Support,

We are investigating possible missing 1-minute stock aggregate bars on the
Stocks Basic plan.

Affected requests:

  1. MMM โ€” missing 2026-08-04 13:58 UTC

Request URL:
https://api.massive.com/v2/aggs/ticker/MMM/range/1/minute/2026-08-04/2026-08-04?adjusted=true&sort=asc&limit=50000

Request ID: 59e0d31b6623dfb8b565f2a737b91667
2. HON โ€” missing 2026-08-04 13:58 UTC

Request URL:
https://api.massive.com/v2/aggs/ticker/HON/range/1/minute/2026-08-04/2026-08-04?adjusted=true&sort=asc&limit=50000

Request ID: ffc89118b047f04c088f21acf7dbd302
3. HON โ€” missing 2026-08-03 13:55 UTC

Request URL:
https://api.massive.com/v2/aggs/ticker/HON/range/1/minute/2026-08-03/2026-08-03?adjusted=true&sort=asc&limit=50000

Request ID: d02d6ce093db8e20584756c36e43bf9f

The adjacent one-minute bars contain material activity:

  • MMM 2026-08-04: 13:57 volume 9,099.618093 / 166 transactions;
    13:59 volume 2,825.923488 / 102 transactions.
  • HON 2026-08-04: 13:57 volume 1,328.076841 / 62 transactions;
    13:59 volume 4,683.273666 / 100 transactions.
  • HON 2026-08-03: 13:54 volume 5,205.521008 / 158 transactions;
    13:56 volume 4,564.955796 / 205 transactions.

Notably, MMM and HON are missing the same minute (2026-08-04 13:58 UTC),
which suggests a possible ingestion-side or symbol-partition issue rather
than two independent no-trade intervals.

HON appears in two of the three cases and underwent a spinoff and company-name
change effective 2026-06-29. Could post-corporate-action symbol mapping be
related to the repeated HON omissions?

We also checked the other 28 current Dow constituents at 13:58 UTC on
2026-08-04. All 28 had bars. Across those 28, the median 13:58 volume and
transaction-count ratios versus the mean of 13:57 and 13:59 were both
approximately 0.898, so we did not observe a market-wide collapse at that
timestamp.

For all three affected five-minute windows, the five-minute aggregate volume
exactly equals the sum of the four available one-minute bars.

Could you please confirm:

  1. Did these intervals have zero qualifying trades because of trade-condition
    filtering, or do they represent an ingestion/data gap?
  2. If this is an ingestion issue, is it known to be systematic, transient, or
    symbol-partition specific?
  3. Are five-minute aggregates constructed from the same underlying base
    aggregates, or independently from qualifying trades?

Thank you.

Guida per i contributori

Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Non viene indicato alcun file del repository, test o punto di ingresso. Inizia riproducendo le tre richieste aggregate usando i relativi ID delle richieste e confrontando i minuti interessati con le barre adiacenti e i totali di cinque minuti. Il lavoro è completato quando si conferma se le barre mancanti sono causate dal filtraggio dei trade o da una lacuna nell’ingestion, nel partizionamento o nella mappatura dei simboli, e si documenta l’ambito.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
api, data
Tipo di issue
Bug
Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Chiarezza
Da chiarire
Idoneità per principianti
35/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.