[Bug]: Incomplete URL substring sanitization Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 442
- Forks
- 159
- Merge moyen
- 7 j 21 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 8
Description
CLI Version
v5.56.2
Command
Sanitizing untrusted URLs is a common technique for preventing attacks such as request forgeries and malicious redirections. Usually, this is done by checking that the host of a URL is in a set of allowed hosts. However, treating the URL as a string and checking if one of the allowed hosts is a substring of the URL is very prone to errors. Malicious URLs can bypass such security checks by embedding one of the allowed hosts in an unexpected location.
Even if the substring check is not used in a security-critical context, the incomplete check may still cause undesirable behaviors when the check succeeds accidentally.
Output
No response
Expected Behavior
Recommendation
Parse a URL before performing a check on its host value, and ensure that the check handles arbitrary subdomain sequences correctly.
Actual Behavior
CWE-20
Steps to Reproduce
POC
The following code checks that a URL redirection will reach the example.com domain.
from flask import Flask, request, redirect
from urllib.parse import urlparse
app = Flask(__name__)
# Not safe, as "evil-example.net/example.com" would be accepted
@app.route('/some/path/bad1')
def unsafe1(request):
target = request.args.get('target', '')
if "example.com" in target:
return redirect(target)
# Not safe, as "benign-looking-prefix-example.com" would be accepted
@app.route('/some/path/bad2')
def unsafe2(request):
target = request.args.get('target', '')
if target.endswith("example.com"):
return redirect(target)
#Simplest and safest approach is to use an allowlist
@app.route('/some/path/good1')
def safe1(request):
allowlist = [
"example.com/home",
"example.com/login",
]
target = request.args.get('target', '')
if target in allowlist:
return redirect(target)
#More complex example allowing sub-domains.
@app.route('/some/path/good2')
def safe2(request):
target = request.args.get('target', '')
host = urlparse(target).hostname
#Note the '.' preceding example.com
if host and host.endswith(".example.com"):
return redirect(target)
The first two examples show unsafe checks that are easily bypassed. In unsafe1 the attacker can simply add example.com anywhere in the url. For example, http://evil-example.net/example.com. In unsafe2 the attacker must use a hostname ending in example.com, but that is easy to do. For example, http://benign-looking-prefix-example.com.
The second two examples show safe checks. In safe1, an allowlist is used. Although fairly inflexible, this is easy to get right and is most likely to be safe. In safe2, urlparse is used to parse the URL, then the hostname is checked to make sure it ends with .example.com.
References
SSRF
XSS Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards Cheat Sheet.
CWE-20.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par tests/integration/domains/test_slave_domains.py à la ligne 73 et suivez la gestion des URL qu’il met à l’épreuve. Vérifiez si la validation de l’hôte repose sur une correspondance de sous-chaînes, puis exécutez le test d’intégration concerné. C’est terminé lorsque des préfixes de nom d’hôte arbitraires ou du texte intégré correspondant à un hôte autorisé ne passent plus la validation, tandis que les hôtes autorisés légitimes continuent de fonctionner.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- cli, security
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Difficulté
- 3/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 45/100