kernelci / kernelci/kernelci-api
Consider adding Bisections as part of the data model
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 10
- Fork
- 21
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Descrizione
I haven't seen bisections mentioned in the code or the documentation so I don't know where they're supposed to fit in the final design.
In the legacy KernelCI, bisections are handled completely separately and away from the main data and we've seen the disadvantages of that, as it's not always trivial to link a bisection to the related regression/s, and it'll be really helpful to have this bi-directional link available at all times to know which regressions a bisection points to and whether a specific regression has been bisected.
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Direzione di ricerca
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing the existing data model and documentation to determine where bisections and their links would fit; done requires an agreed design for representing the bidirectional relationship with regressions.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- python
- Ambito
- database
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100