kernelci / kernelci/kernelci-api
Consider adding Bisections as part of the data model
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 10
- Forks
- 21
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
I haven't seen bisections mentioned in the code or the documentation so I don't know where they're supposed to fit in the final design.
In the legacy KernelCI, bisections are handled completely separately and away from the main data and we've seen the disadvantages of that, as it's not always trivial to link a bisection to the related regression/s, and it'll be really helpful to have this bi-directional link available at all times to know which regressions a bisection points to and whether a specific regression has been bisected.
Guide de contribution
Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt
Piste de recherche
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing the existing data model and documentation to determine where bisections and their links would fit; done requires an agreed design for representing the bidirectional relationship with regressions.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- database
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100