kernelci / kernelci/kernelci-api

Consider adding Bisections as part of the data model

Ouverte
#375 1 commentaire 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub
Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
10
Forks
21
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Description

I haven't seen bisections mentioned in the code or the documentation so I don't know where they're supposed to fit in the final design.

In the legacy KernelCI, bisections are handled completely separately and away from the main data and we've seen the disadvantages of that, as it's not always trivial to link a bisection to the related regression/s, and it'll be really helpful to have this bi-directional link available at all times to know which regressions a bisection points to and whether a specific regression has been bisected.

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Piste de recherche

No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing the existing data model and documentation to determine where bisections and their links would fit; done requires an agreed design for representing the bidirectional relationship with regressions.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Évaluation

Stack technique
python
Domaine
database
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Activité
À l'abandon
Clarté
À clarifier
Accessibilité débutants
25/100

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.