jbcoe/cc-protocol

View on GitHub

A type erased value-type for C++ using reflection

Stars: 11
Forks: 4
Open beginner issues: 0
Indexed issues: 47
Avg merge: 16h 39m
Merged PRs (30d): 131

Dominant language: C++
License: MIT
Last GitHub push: Sep 16, 2026
Latest indexed: Sep 18, 2026
Contributing guide: Contributing guide
Code of conduct: No code of conduct
Beginner labels: No beginner labels indexed

Open All

47 issues indexed so far

Propagate constexpr-ness of interface member functions (noexcept done in #37) Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#23 · 6 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
See if we can implement other type-erased types (like std::function) Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#27 · 1 comment · 1 reaction · 2 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Add support for TypeSanitizer and RealTimeSanitizer Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#55 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Restore formal wording for protocol and protocol_view Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#76 · 0 comments · 1 reaction · 2 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Consider consolidation with https://ryanjk5.github.io/posts/rjk-duck/ Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#94 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Handle value category propagation Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#97 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Narrowing protocols with reflection Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#98 · 3 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
How should RHS operators be handled? Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#100 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Reconsider implicit conversions for interface conformance Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#121 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Add a tutorial on C++26 reflection Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#135 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Should protocol implement SBO? Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#148 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Consider secondary implementation with token injection Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#154 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Consider handling of attributes for interface conformance Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#163 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
DRAFT.md: state the T-vs-I special member rule and the move-semantics divergence from P3019 Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#194 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Review constexpr handling in C++26 reflection implementation. Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#200 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Add constexpr to protocol and protocol_view constructors where it can be supported Open

design Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#236 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Add the required status checks to the `main` ruleset once #248 merges Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#249 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Generalize operator implementation Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#252 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Add narrowing constructors to protocol_view<T> and protocol_view<const T> Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#255 · 4 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Support more parameter types in vtable name mangling Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#259 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Should `protocol<I>` conform to `I`? Open

design

jbcoe/cc-protocol#262 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Should an unqualified interface member allow two dispatch paths? Open

design

jbcoe/cc-protocol#268 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Track clang-p2996 issues that affect this repository Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#277 · 0 comments · 1 reaction · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Fuzz testing Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#278 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Constructing a protocol_view from a valueless protocol is undiagnosed, and calls through it hit a null function pointer Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#284 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Rewrite DRAFT.md Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#286 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Draft a paper on why C++ needs a type erasing wrapper Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#287 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Create benchmarks Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#294 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Allow protocol to accept non-class types Open

design

jbcoe/cc-protocol#300 · 2 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Interface member names that collide with protocol's own members are silently hidden Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#318 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Consider T&& assignment operator Open

design

jbcoe/cc-protocol#322 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Allow the agentic sandbox to run using podman Open

Important offline workflow

jbcoe/cc-protocol#328 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Consider presenting something at CppCon 2026 Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#331 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Bake the uv and Bazel caches into the sandbox image instead of Docker volumes Open

enhancement offline workflow

jbcoe/cc-protocol#358 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Can `protocol_view<T&&>` be made to work in a useful or meaningful way? Open

design

jbcoe/cc-protocol#372 · 1 comment · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Discuss support for narrowing Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#390 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Consider function templates as conformance candidates Open

design

jbcoe/cc-protocol#393 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Rewrite DRAFT Open

design Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#396 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Read Eduardo's design Open

design

jbcoe/cc-protocol#399 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Member comparison operators on an interface are now a hard error Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#401 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Conversion functions on an interface are neither forwarded nor rejected Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#402 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Allocation operators on an interface are silently dropped Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#403 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Share interfaces across the operator tests to cut compile time Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#404 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Three copies of the function-pointer-type builder Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#405 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 1 assignee · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Duplicated name computation and two naming schemes in `protocol_interface_function_infos` Open

Important

jbcoe/cc-protocol#406 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Restore the documented limitations, in a document of their own Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#407 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026
Read External Polymorphism Open

jbcoe/cc-protocol#414 · 0 comments · 0 reactions · 0 assignees · Indexed Sep 18, 2026

jbcoe/cc-protocol

Get new issues in your inbox