Revisit the threading and ordering guarantees of StreamTracer
- 主要言語
- Java
- スター
- 12.1k
- フォーク
- 4k
- 平均マージ
- 2日 17時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 37
説明
Currently `StreamTracer` must be thread-safe, as gRPC doesn't guarantee synchronized invocation for it. While the entire class can't be marked as not-thread-safe, as `inboundUncompressedSize()` may be called from a different thread (app thread) from `inboundMessage()` (network thread), some methods are called sequentially, e.g., `inboundMessage()` and `outboundMessage()`. If a tracer implementation only cares about `inboundMessage()`, it may be totally safe to not to synchronize. We need to find a way to relax the thread-safety requirement to make it easier to implement.
We also need a better definition on the ordering of the methods, e.g., is it possible for `inboundMessage()` to happen after `streamClosed()`?
コントリビューションガイド
評価
この issue はまだ評価されていません。