[Bug] Graph-node save incorrect block cache during reorgs

Bug report

In case reorg happend and graph-node has seen it we would have 2 entries in the cache table:
Example for reorg on ethereum mainnet on block 17820205 with depth=1

graph=# select hash, number, parent_hash from chain1.blocks where number=17820205 (https://etherscan.io/block/17820205/f)

                                hash                                |  number  |                            parent_hash                             
--------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
 \xdcb02b80a71bb335a8247298cfde2af9f589b491a1eb794a88fa377fb00e6fb8 | 17820205 | \x9432a65af5ecd186859c22bf4d809561aaa4daf3bf8101fccb3f228e34b64756
 \xc0455fae763cd8d53bc294cbd32225f207dee56cb396aee84eaaa5011513731a | 17820205 | \x9432a65af5ecd186859c22bf4d809561aaa4daf3bf8101fccb3f228e34b64756
(2 rows)

graph=# select hash, number, parent_hash from chain1.blocks where number=17820206;
                                hash                                |  number  |                            parent_hash                             
--------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
 \x409c0bb686a5fac90e706a556d02cf99122b49c683374c82341cccc836807964 | 17820206 | \xc0455fae763cd8d53bc294cbd32225f207dee56cb396aee84eaaa5011513731a
(1 row)

graph=# select hash, number, parent_hash from chain1.blocks where number=17820204;
                                hash                                |  number  |                            parent_hash                             
--------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
 \x9432a65af5ecd186859c22bf4d809561aaa4daf3bf8101fccb3f228e34b64756 | 17820204 | \x737d8549261f685b18b6c6f2dac460c6dfc4b88bf16b03d2a813ed51f9c08c40
(1 row)

From our experience that sometimes cause errors in subgraphs, because the subgraph takes incorrect data from the cache (This need confirming)
We had a problem when the subgraph was stuck until we remove duplicates from the cache.

Relevant log output

No response

IPFS hash

No response

Subgraph name or link to explorer

No response

Some information to help us out

• Tick this box if this bug is caused by a regression found in the latest release.
• Tick this box if this bug is specific to the hosted service.
• I have searched the issue tracker to make sure this issue is not a duplicate.

OS information

None

Commencez par reproduire les requêtes SQL signalées sur le cache chain1.blocks pour la réorganisation citée aux blocs 17820204–17820206. Suivez la manière dont les blocs réorganisés sont enregistrés et sélectionnés, puis vérifiez si des entrées de blocs en double peuvent amener un subgraph à utiliser des données incorrectes ou à rester bloqué. Le travail est terminé lorsque le comportement du cache est confirmé ou réfuté par un test de régression ou une reproduction documentée.