googleapis / googleapis/google-http-java-client
Once more, GenericJson.clone() method blows up when trying to clone Google reads
- 主要言語
- Java
- スター
- 1.4k
- フォーク
- 473
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
説明
This is related to #293, but #293's fix doesn't work for this problem.
From the Hellbender project (broadinstitute/hellbender#650):
When we copy a Google read (ie., a com.google.api.services.genomics.model.Read), we currently call into the GenericJson.clone() method, which uses reflection to deep copy the fields. However it seems to run into difficulty with `com.google.common.collect.Lists$TransformingRandomAccessList`.
Here's the stack trace:
```
Error: (e0086ea6f7eea4e6): java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: unable to create new instance of class com.google.common.collect.Lists$TransformingRandomAccessList possibly because it is not public
at com.google.api.client.util.Types.handleExceptionForNewInstance(Types.java:165)
at com.google.api.client.util.Types.newInstance(Types.java:120)
at com.google.api.client.util.Data.clone(Data.java:229)
at com.google.api.client.util.Data.deepCopy(Data.java:302)
at com.google.api.client.util.GenericData.clone(GenericData.java:172)
at com.google.api.client.json.GenericJson.clone(GenericJson.java:90)
at com.google.api.services.genomics.model.LinearAlignment.clone(LinearAlignment.java:128)
at com.google.api.services.genomics.model.LinearAlignment.clone(LinearAlignment.java:34)
at com.google.api.client.util.Data.clone(Data.java:212)
at com.google.api.client.util.Data.deepCopy(Data.java:302)
at com.google.api.client.util.GenericData.clone(GenericData.java:172)
at com.google.api.client.json.GenericJson.clone(GenericJson.java:90)
at com.google.api.services.genomics.model.Read.clone(Read.java:548)
at org.broadinstitute.hellbender.utils.read.GoogleGenomicsReadToGATKReadAdapter.copy(GoogleGenomicsReadToGATKReadAdapter.java:637)
at org.broadinstitute.hellbender.tools.dataflow.transforms.bqsr.ApplyBQSRTransform$ApplyBQSR.processElement(ApplyBQSRTransform.java:65)
```
コントリビューションガイド
評価
この issue はまだ評価されていません。