google / google/adk-python-community
feat(plugins): add AuthorityRoutingPlugin — pre-execution authority posture (ADVISE/EXECUTE/DEFER/STOP)
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 182
- フォーク
- 75
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
説明
## Problem
Tool schemas and permissions govern *access* — which tools exist and who may call them. They do not govern *authorization*: whether the agent was allowed to act **at all** for a given request, and within what scope. That gap is where three recurring agent failures live:
- **advice becomes action** — the user asked for a recommendation and the agent executed anyway;
- **scope expansion** — one bounded edit ballooned into a dependent workflow;
- **missing approval** — an approval was clearly required and the agent proceeded.
`AgentGovernancePlugin` (policy-as-code allow/deny) and the HITL approval gateway answer *"is this tool call permitted by policy?"*. Neither answers *"was the agent authorized to act at all, and within what scope?"* — and both require external infrastructure (a policy engine / an approval service).
## Proposal
Add `AuthorityRoutingPlugin`, a self-contained `BasePlugin` that assigns an **authority posture** to every tool call before it runs:
| Posture | Meaning |
| --- | --- |
| ADVISE | Recommendations only; no tool side effects. |
| EXECUTE | Act, within an explicitly bounded scope. |
| DEFER | Pause and request authorization when scope/approval is unclear. |
| STOP | Refuse when the work is not allowed. |
Two stages produce the final posture:
1. **Posture router** (optional, caller-supplied callable — typically a model call) returning a validated verdict with a scope statement.
2. **Deterministic guard** — an irreversibility keyword tripwire + an approval-state check — composed with the router under **most-restrictive-wins**: plain code can only make a posture *stricter*, never looser.
Design properties:
- **Fail-closed** — an unparseable or raised router verdict defaults to DEFER.
- **Guard-only mode** (no router) is fully deterministic and needs no model and no extra dependency.
- Complements, rather than duplicates, the existing governance plugins.
## Scope
- `src/google/adk_community/plugins/authority_routing_plugin.py` + export
- `tests/plugins/test_authority_routing_plugin.py` (deterministic, no credentials)
- `contributing/samples/authority_routing/` (runnable sample with live output)
Happy to adjust the API surface or placement to match maintainer preferences. I have an implementation ready and will open a PR referencing this issue.
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
まず既存の BasePlugin と governance plugin の動作を読み、次に src/google/adk_community/plugins/authority_routing_plugin.py と tests/plugins/test_authority_routing_plugin.py にある提案されたパスを確認します。posture routing、fail-closed 処理、不可逆性トリップワイヤ、承認チェック、最も制限の厳しいものを優先する動作について決定論的なテストを追加し、contributing/samples/authority_routing/ に実行可能なサンプルも追加します。プラグインがエクスポートされ、サンプルが認証情報なしでライブ出力を生成すれば完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- security
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 静か
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 45/100