go-python / go-python/gpython

py.RunFile / RunCode doesn't handle a nil module pointer

Abierto
#249 2 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
Lenguaje dominante
Go
Estrellas
1k
Forks
105
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Descripción

Hey, there. It's really cool to be able to run Python in Go! I'd like to congratulate you on this project, it might be exactly what I've been looking for when it comes to an easily embeddable scripting language.

I just noticed that `py.RunFile()` and `py.RunCode()` don't handle a `nil` `py.Module` pointer when deciding to create a new module. I feel like that would lessen the friction on using it, since if you run multiple files and want them to be in a single module you currently have to call two different `RunFile() / RunCode()` calls that are essentially the same (just with `nil` as the `inModule` argument the first time).

Basically, currently I'm doing this:

```go
var mod *py.Module

...

// In a for loop for mutliple .py files

if mod == nil {
mod, err = py.RunFile(context, fpath, py.CompileOpts{UseSysPaths: true}, nil) // Returns a new module
} else {
mod, err = py.RunFile(context, fpath, py.CompileOpts{UseSysPaths: true}, mod) // Adds onto the existing one
}
```

and it would be easier to just do this:

```go
var mod *py.Module

...

mod, err = py.RunFile(context, fpath, py.CompileOpts{UseSysPaths: true}, mod) // Returns a new module on first run because 'mod' is nil, adds onto the existing module afterwards
```

I believe to implement this I would just need to modify `RunCode()` to check for `nil` in the `case *Module` part of the inModule type check. Does this sound OK?

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.