Project Naming Conventions in GITHUB

We are migrating from perforce to GITHUB , we have a deeply nested structure in perforce and we cant follow the same in GITHUB.

Example

ProductName-ServiceName-Version-Public/Private-ArtifactName
example webs-subscription-v3-pub-signup.
Can we move this as is to GITHUB.

We also have a requirement where the same service can have multiple versions and each version is a totally different implementation and cannot have the same master repository.
Is introducing version numbers in the project naming conventions a good practice for the above mentioned use case.

The issue mentions migrating a deeply nested Perforce structure to GitHub and gives the example webs-subscription-v3-pub-signup. Start by reviewing GitHub project naming conventions and how separate implementations and versions should be organized. Done would be a clear recommendation addressing the proposed naming pattern and versioned repositories; no files or tests are named.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.