github / github/github-mcp-server
Optional "Receipt Required" guard for destructive tools (delete_repo, permissions)
- Linguagem predominante
- Go
- Estrelas
- 33k
- Forks
- 5k
- Merge médio
- 2d 1h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 52
Descrição
This server exposes irreversible tools (`delete_repository`, visibility/permission changes). I maintain EMILIA's open **Receipt Required** rail (Apache-2.0): a small, **opt-in** gate so an irreversible tool refuses to run unless a named human signed an authorization receipt for that *exact* action.
The four-step behavior (CI-verified):
- missing receipt → `428 Receipt Required`
- valid, action-bound receipt → runs
- same receipt replayed → refused (one-time consumption)
- forged receipt → refused
It's **disabled by default, no protocol lock-in** — purely additive. There's a runnable `github-admin` example mirroring `delete_repo`, plus a 10-minute guide. Would you be open to a PR adding this behind an opt-in flag? Happy to author it.
Spec + guide: https://github.com/emiliaprotocol/emilia-protocol/blob/main/docs/guides/RECEIPT-REQUIRED-MCP.md
Guia de contribuição
Direção de pesquisa
Read the linked RECEIPT-REQUIRED-MCP.md guide and inspect the existing delete_repository, visibility, and permission tool entry points in github-mcp-server. Compare the proposed github-admin example with the server’s current tool behavior; done means an opt-in, additive guard that rejects missing, replayed, or forged receipts while allowing valid action-bound receipts.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- github, go
- Domínio
- api, authorization, security
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Dificuldade
- 5/5
- Tempo estimado
- Mais de uma semana
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 35/100