github / github/github-mcp-server
Optional "Receipt Required" guard for destructive tools (delete_repo, permissions)
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 33k
- Fork
- 5k
- Merge medio
- 2g 1h
- PR unite (30g)
- 52
Descrizione
This server exposes irreversible tools (`delete_repository`, visibility/permission changes). I maintain EMILIA's open **Receipt Required** rail (Apache-2.0): a small, **opt-in** gate so an irreversible tool refuses to run unless a named human signed an authorization receipt for that *exact* action.
The four-step behavior (CI-verified):
- missing receipt → `428 Receipt Required`
- valid, action-bound receipt → runs
- same receipt replayed → refused (one-time consumption)
- forged receipt → refused
It's **disabled by default, no protocol lock-in** — purely additive. There's a runnable `github-admin` example mirroring `delete_repo`, plus a 10-minute guide. Would you be open to a PR adding this behind an opt-in flag? Happy to author it.
Spec + guide: https://github.com/emiliaprotocol/emilia-protocol/blob/main/docs/guides/RECEIPT-REQUIRED-MCP.md
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Direzione di ricerca
Read the linked RECEIPT-REQUIRED-MCP.md guide and inspect the existing delete_repository, visibility, and permission tool entry points in github-mcp-server. Compare the proposed github-admin example with the server’s current tool behavior; done means an opt-in, additive guard that rejects missing, replayed, or forged receipts while allowing valid action-bound receipts.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- github, go
- Ambito
- api, authorization, security
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100