github / github/gh-stack

`gh stack checkout` reports "Local stack matches remote" without comparing local branch refs

未關閉
#413 0 則留言 1 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
bug topic: cli - general
主要語言
Go
星號
1.5k
分支
70
平均合併
1 天 8 小時
30 天內合併 PR
7

描述

## Summary

`gh stack checkout` reports `✓ Local stack matches remote` when a local branch has diverged from its remote counterpart. It appears to compare its recorded state against the remote, and never against the actual local branch refs — so a local branch that has moved is invisible to the check.

```
$ git rev-parse --short=10 stack-b-two # local
df863cea57
$ git rev-parse --short=10 origin/stack-b-two # remote, one commit ahead
41fd74d3ae

$ gh stack checkout 6
✓ Local stack matches remote — switching to branch (stack #6)
ℹ Already on stack-b-two

$ gh stack view --short # no warning, no ⚠ Needs rebase
Stack #6
» stack-b-two ○ #5 (current)
├ stack-b-one ○ #4
└ main
```

The extension's own state file held the **correct** value the whole time:

```
$ jq -r '.stacks[].branches[] | select(.branch=="stack-b-two") | .head' .git/gh-stack
41fd74d3ae... # matches the remote; the local ref is what diverged
```

So this is not stale metadata. Recorded state and remote agreed, the local ref disagreed with both, and nothing compared against it.

## Why this matters

This is the reassurance a user sees immediately before #380 destroys their work. In that state `gh stack push` rewinds the remote branch and the commits become unreachable — and if the branch loses its only commit, GitHub auto-closes the PR with no files. The sequence is:

```
gh stack checkout -> "✓ Local stack matches remote"
gh stack push -> "✓ Pushed N branches" (remote commits gone, PR closed)
```

Fixing #380 addresses the destruction. Fixing this addresses the false confidence that leads someone to run the command in the first place.

## How a local branch gets behind

Anything not mediated by the extension. A plain `git fetch` after a colleague pushes; CI committing to the PR head branch (the trigger in #380); or building a change in a `git worktree` and pushing it with `git push origin :`, which moves the remote and leaves the local branch untouched.

## Reproduction

Against a stack whose branches are in sync:

```bash
git switch
git reset --hard HEAD~1 # simulate the local branch falling behind
gh stack checkout # -> "✓ Local stack matches remote"
gh stack view --short # -> no warning
```

Public repo with two stacks set up for this: https://github.com/xn/gh-stack-repro

## Expected

Compare recorded/remote heads against the actual local branch refs. On divergence, say so and name the fix (`git branch -f origin/`), rather than reporting a match.

A `gh stack status` / `gh stack doctor` surfacing per-branch local-vs-remote drift would cover the general case, since plain git will always be able to desync the extension's state.

## Environment

- `gh` 2.97.0
- `gh-stack` v0.1.0
- git 2.50.1
- macOS 26.4.1, darwin/arm64

## Related

- #380 — the data loss this false reassurance leads into.
- #193 — handling rebases performed outside `gh stack`; same general gap (external git operations invisible to the extension).

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

研究方向

從 `gh stack checkout` 命令開始,追蹤回報 `Local stack matches remote` 的檢查;使用 `git reset --hard` 移動本機分支 ref 後,執行提供的重現步驟。完成的標準是,該命令將記錄的或遠端的 heads 與實際的本機 refs 進行比較,在出現偏差時發出警告,並指出建議使用 `git branch -f` 進行修正。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
git, go
領域
cli
Issue 類型
缺陷
難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
活躍度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
55/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。