`gh stack checkout` reports "Local stack matches remote" without comparing local branch refs
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 70
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 8 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 7
Beschreibung
## Summary
`gh stack checkout` reports `✓ Local stack matches remote` when a local branch has diverged from its remote counterpart. It appears to compare its recorded state against the remote, and never against the actual local branch refs — so a local branch that has moved is invisible to the check.
```
$ git rev-parse --short=10 stack-b-two # local
df863cea57
$ git rev-parse --short=10 origin/stack-b-two # remote, one commit ahead
41fd74d3ae
$ gh stack checkout 6
✓ Local stack matches remote — switching to branch (stack #6)
ℹ Already on stack-b-two
$ gh stack view --short # no warning, no ⚠ Needs rebase
Stack #6
» stack-b-two ○ #5 (current)
├ stack-b-one ○ #4
└ main
```
The extension's own state file held the **correct** value the whole time:
```
$ jq -r '.stacks[].branches[] | select(.branch=="stack-b-two") | .head' .git/gh-stack
41fd74d3ae... # matches the remote; the local ref is what diverged
```
So this is not stale metadata. Recorded state and remote agreed, the local ref disagreed with both, and nothing compared against it.
## Why this matters
This is the reassurance a user sees immediately before #380 destroys their work. In that state `gh stack push` rewinds the remote branch and the commits become unreachable — and if the branch loses its only commit, GitHub auto-closes the PR with no files. The sequence is:
```
gh stack checkout -> "✓ Local stack matches remote"
gh stack push -> "✓ Pushed N branches" (remote commits gone, PR closed)
```
Fixing #380 addresses the destruction. Fixing this addresses the false confidence that leads someone to run the command in the first place.
## How a local branch gets behind
Anything not mediated by the extension. A plain `git fetch` after a colleague pushes; CI committing to the PR head branch (the trigger in #380); or building a change in a `git worktree` and pushing it with `git push origin :`, which moves the remote and leaves the local branch untouched.
## Reproduction
Against a stack whose branches are in sync:
```bash
git switch
git reset --hard HEAD~1 # simulate the local branch falling behind
gh stack checkout # -> "✓ Local stack matches remote"
gh stack view --short # -> no warning
```
Public repo with two stacks set up for this: https://github.com/xn/gh-stack-repro
## Expected
Compare recorded/remote heads against the actual local branch refs. On divergence, say so and name the fix (`git branch -f origin/`), rather than reporting a match.
A `gh stack status` / `gh stack doctor` surfacing per-branch local-vs-remote drift would cover the general case, since plain git will always be able to desync the extension's state.
## Environment
- `gh` 2.97.0
- `gh-stack` v0.1.0
- git 2.50.1
- macOS 26.4.1, darwin/arm64
## Related
- #380 — the data loss this false reassurance leads into.
- #193 — handling rebases performed outside `gh stack`; same general gap (external git operations invisible to the extension).
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Beginne beim Befehl `gh stack checkout` und verfolge die Prüfung, die `Local stack matches remote` meldet; führe die bereitgestellte Reproduktion aus, nachdem du einen lokalen Branch-Ref mit `git reset --hard` verschoben hast. Fertig ist es, wenn der Befehl aufgezeichnete oder Remote-Heads mit den tatsächlichen lokalen Refs vergleicht, bei einer Abweichung warnt und die vorgeschlagene Korrektur mit `git branch -f` nennt.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- git, go
- Bereich
- cli
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 55/100