github / github/copilot-sdk

Unhandled "provider is closed" inside the runtime's own error handler terminates the host process

オープン
#2,517 コメント 2 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る
主要言語
Java
スター
10.5k
フォーク
1.5k
平均マージ
1日 11時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
128

説明

**Environment:** `@github/copilot` 1.0.71 (win32-x64), Node v24.16.0, .NET 8 host embedding the SDK in-process (napi-oop-runtime).

## Summary

When a tool-call result is written to a session after its provider has been closed, the runtime raises `Error: provider is closed`. Its error handler then logs that failure *through the same closed provider*, which throws a second time inside the handler. That second throw is unhandled and terminates the host process with `0xC0000005` (access violation) rather than failing the operation.

```
Error: provider is closed
at Object.call (napi-oop-runtime/dist/index.js:68:2208)
at Proxy.S (napi-oop-runtime/dist/index.js:68:3671)
at t.filterSecrets (app.js:114:26376)
at wR.filterSecrets (app.js:143:52707)
at wR.error (app.js:651:10732)
at wR.writeLog (app.js:652:163)
at Hle.logToLevel (app.js:61:1536)
at Hle.error (app.js:61:1719)
at t.handleError (app.js:5076:625)
at process. (app.js:5076:360)
```

The final two frames are the process-level handler, so there is nothing left to catch it.

## Reproduction shape

1. Create a session and subscribe to `ExternalToolRequestedEvent`.
2. Dispatch the tool asynchronously — the event handler cannot await it, so the dispatch is fire-and-forget.
3. Dispose the session while a dispatch is still in flight, for example because the turn was cancelled by a deadline.
4. The dispatch completes and calls `session.Rpc.Tools.HandlePendingToolCallAsync(...)` on the now-closed session.

Observed reliably on a long-running host that creates one session per turn against a process-wide client.

## Impact

The whole host process dies, not just the affected session. For a service embedding the SDK, every concurrent operation in that process is lost, and the failure surfaces as a process exit rather than an exception the caller can handle. A caller cannot defend against this in managed code either, since an access violation is not catchable.

## Suggested fix

Make the error-handling path resilient to a closed provider. `filterSecrets` / `writeLog` reach back into the provider while handling an error that the provider itself raised; falling back to a local sink when the provider is unavailable would keep the secondary failure inside `handleError` instead of letting it escape.

More generally, an error raised because a resource is closed should not be reported through that same resource.

## Workaround

On the caller side: gate any post-dispatch write on session liveness, and drain in-flight dispatches before disposing the session. That removes the trigger but not the underlying fragility — any other error raised after provider close will still terminate the process.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

調査の方向性

Start with the napi-oop-runtime error path shown in dist/index.js and the filterSecrets, writeLog, and handleError frames in app.js; reproduce an in-flight tool dispatch followed by session disposal. Done means a post-close failure is reported without recursively using the closed provider, and the host remains running with a catchable operation failure.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
csharp, node.js
領域
api, backend
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
活発さ
活発
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
48/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。