github / github/copilot-plugins

Ecosystem guidance – copilot-plugins vs. awesome-copilot (vs. self-published)?

オープン
#35 コメント 1 件 リアクション 2 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る
主要言語
PowerShell
スター
360
フォーク
125
平均マージ
5日 17時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
2

説明

Hi! I’m the author of `flutter-slipstream`, a plugin and MCP server that gives coding agents runtime inspection and interaction capabilities for Flutter apps. It currently supports Claude Code and Gemini CLI and I'm gearing up to support Copilot.

I'm trying to figure out the best path for distribution and could use some guidance. I like the improved discovery that comes with official marketplaces, but I want to make sure I'm putting the tool in the right place without bottlenecking my release cycle. I have two main questions:

**1. Where does a tool like this belong?**

What is the philosophical dividing line between `copilot-plugins` (the official collection) and `awesome-copilot`? Does a tool like Slipstream / MCP for Flutter belong in the official collection, or is that reserved for general-purpose language tools?

**2. How does the release cycle work if I'm listed?**

If `flutter-slipstream` is included in either `copilot-plugins` or `awesome-copilot`, how are new versions handled? I know you can reference an external repository, but if I push a `v1.1.0` bug fix to my own repo, do I have to wait for a PR review to ungate that release?

Any advice appreciated; thanks!

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

評価

この issue はまだ評価されていません。

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。