github / github/copilot-cli

OTel: post-reload resumed turn emits `invoke_agent` root without input messages

オープン
#4,726 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

area:sessions
主要言語
Shell
スター
11.2k
フォーク
1.9k
平均マージ
14時間 16分
マージ済み PR(30日)
6

説明

Describe the bug

When a running Copilot CLI turn in VS Code Agent Host is interrupted by a VS Code window reload and then continues after Agent Host reconnects, the new root invoke_agent span can omit gen_ai.input.messages even though message-content capture is enabled.

This is specific to the resumed/continued invocation path, not every turn:

  • the ordinary user turn immediately before the reload emitted both gen_ai.input.messages and gen_ai.output.messages on its invoke_agent root;
  • the post-reload continuation emitted gen_ai.output.messages, but no gen_ai.input.messages, on its new invoke_agent root;
  • ordinary user turns immediately afterward again emitted both input and output.

The exporter was healthy and child chat/tool spans were present. Some later child model spans contained input content, so this was not a transport failure or a global content-capture setting problem.

In LangSmith, gen_ai.input.messages is mapped to the run input. The affected root therefore appears as No data in the trace/Turns UI even though the continued turn did useful work and produced child spans.

Affected version

Observed on 1.0.81-0 (the value recorded in both the root span's service.version and gen_ai.agent.version attributes).

The latest CLI installed locally is now 1.0.82, but I have not yet repeated the active-turn reload sequence on that version, so I cannot claim that version is affected.

Steps to reproduce the behavior
  1. In VS Code, enable Agent Host OTel export and content capture:

    {
      "chat.agentHost.otel.enabled": true,
      "chat.agentHost.otel.exporterType": "otlp-http",
      "chat.agentHost.otel.captureContent": true,
      "chat.agentHost.otel.dbSpanExporter.enabled": true
    }
    
  2. Start a Copilot CLI / Agent Host request that performs enough tool work to remain active.

  3. While the turn is still running, reload the VS Code window.

  4. Let Agent Host reconnect and continue the existing turn.

  5. Inspect the locally exported OTLP spans or the configured backend.

  6. Compare the invoke_agent root created for the post-reload continuation with ordinary roots before and after it.

Observed result: the continuation root has output and child spans but no gen_ai.input.messages attribute.

Expected behavior

With content capture enabled, an invoke_agent root that continues a user-initiated turn after reconnect/reload should remain self-contained and include the originating user input in gen_ai.input.messages.

If a reconnect intentionally starts a separate continuation trace, it should still carry meaningful continuation input/context (and ideally an explicit link to the original invocation) so OTel backends do not display an input-less root.

Additional context
  • VS Code: 1.136.1
  • OS: macOS
  • Integration: VS Code Agent Host using the Copilot SDK/runtime
  • Export: OTLP/HTTP to LangSmith plus the Agent Host local SQLite span exporter
  • No OTLP forwarding failures were present after reload.
  • The affected root began immediately after the fresh Agent Host process started, before the next user message. Its predecessor ended just before reload, and the next ordinary user-message root had input normally. This is why the evidence points to the reload/resume lifecycle path rather than an intermittent exporter failure.
  • The public SDK telemetry E2E test validates the invoke_agent root structurally, but currently checks captured input/output content only on child chat spans: https://github.com/github/copilot-sdk/blob/main/nodejs/test/e2e/telemetry.e2e.test.ts

A regression test that reloads/reconnects during an active turn and asserts root-level gen_ai.input.messages would cover this path without relying on a particular OTel backend.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

nodejs/test/e2e/telemetry.e2e.test.ts から始め、Agent Host のテレメトリパスにおけるアクティブターンの reload/reconnect ライフサイクルを追跡します。コンテンツキャプチャを有効にして継続シナリオを再現し、その後、再開された invoke_agent ルートに gen_ai.input.messages が含まれることを確認するカバレッジを追加して、テレメトリ E2E テストを実行します。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
nodejs
領域
observability-sre, testing-qa
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
活発さ
活発
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
66/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。