github / github/copilot-cli

Issues and Pull requests panels resolve to the fork, ignoring gh repo set-default

Đang mở
#4,689 0 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

area:configuration area:sessions
Ngôn ngữ chính
Shell
Star
11.2k
Fork
1.9k
Merge trung bình
14 giờ 16 phút
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
6

Mô tả

Describe the feature or problem you'd like to solve

The native TUI panels (Session | Issues | Pull requests | Gists) resolve to
whatever origin points at, with no way to honor a configured base/default
repository. In the near-universal fork-based contribution model this makes the
Issues and Pull requests panels permanently empty.

Concrete layout. A local clone with:

  • origingit@github.com:tykeal/keymaster.git (a fork; issues/PRs
    intentionally disabled/empty)
  • upstreamgit@github.com:FutureTense/keymaster.git (the real project;
    all issues and PRs live here)

gh already resolves this correctly. In that same directory:

$ gh repo set-default --view
FutureTense/keymaster

But Copilot CLI's own local session store records repository = tykeal/keymaster for every session started in that directory — it never
records FutureTense/keymaster. So the two first-party GitHub terminal tools
disagree about which repository the user is working in, and only gh matches
what the user configured. The direct consequence is that Issues and
Pull requests show nothing, because they are pointed at the fork rather than
upstream.

Environment: GitHub Copilot CLI 1.0.82, Linux x64, github.com.

Observations from inspecting the shipped bundle

These are starting points from reading
~/.cache/copilot/pkg/linux-x64/1.0.82/app.js, offered to save triage time.
They are likely incomplete: the authoritative panel/session repo resolution
appears to run in native code (sessionResolveRepository /
sessionScalarRepositoryName via the native session binding), not in the JS
bundle, so I could not read the definitive precedence.

  • There is a hardcoded remote-priority list I8n=["origin","upstream"],
    consumed as
    I8n.map(s=>t.find(a=>a.remoteName===s)).filter(s=>s!==void 0) inside an
    async function BG(e) that calls githubReposFromRemotes(e) and returns
    {headOwner, baseRepos}, debug-tagged [branchPr]. So the branch→PR
    matcher does consider both remotes, ordered origin-first.
  • The string gh-resolved does not appear anywhere in app.js. That is the
    git config key gh writes on gh repo set-default
    (remote.<name>.gh-resolved = base). So there is no code path that reads
    gh's configured base repo.

Proposed solution

Copilot CLI and gh are both first-party GitHub terminal tools. A user who has
already told gh which repo is the base (via gh repo set-default) should not
have to tell Copilot CLI separately. gh solved this exact problem with
gh repo set-default and the remote.<name>.gh-resolved git config key;
Copilot CLI should follow the same convention rather than blindly resolving to
origin.

Concrete options, in rough preference order:

  1. Read remote.<name>.gh-resolved=base so gh repo set-default just works
    with no extra configuration.
  2. Fall back to the GitHub API's parent/source field when origin is a
    fork whose issues are disabled or empty, resolving to the upstream.
  3. Offer an explicit setting and/or a panel-level repo switcher so the user can
    pick base vs head per session.

This is the complementary read-side of #2318 ("Ability to default PRs to an
upstream", open, which already proposes gh repo set-default as the
mechanism): #2318 is about which repo PRs are written to, this issue is about
which repo the Issues/PR panels are read from. They may share a single
resolution fix.

Possibly the same root cause ("what is the current repo"): #3927 ("Bare
#NNNNN auto-linkifies against the current repo, breaking cross-repo issue/PR
references", open).

Distinct from #4148 ("Issues panel shows 'No open issues found' on GitHub
Enterprise Server (ghe.com) repos", closed as not planned): that shares the
empty-panel symptom but has a different root cause (enterprise host
resolution), not fork/upstream resolution. This is not a duplicate of it.

Current workaround and why it is unsatisfying

Rename remotes so origin points at upstream and set
git config remote.pushDefault fork. This fights the near-universal fork
convention (tooling, docs, and muscle memory all assume origin is your
fork), and it risks retargeting branch pushes at upstream if pushDefault is
ever forgotten.

Example prompts or workflows

  1. In a fork clone, open the Issues panel to review the upstream project's
    open issues without leaving the terminal.
  2. In a fork clone, open the Pull requests panel to pick up an open upstream
    PR to review.
  3. Reference an upstream issue by bare #1234 in a prompt and have it link to
    the upstream repo, not the fork.
  4. Run gh repo set-default FutureTense/keymaster, then start Copilot CLI in
    the same directory and have its panels resolve to FutureTense/keymaster
    automatically.
  5. Toggle a session between base (FutureTense/keymaster) and head
    (tykeal/keymaster) to compare open items in the fork vs upstream.

Additional context

Verified before filing: #2318 OPEN, #3927 OPEN, #4148 CLOSED (not planned).
gh repo set-default --view returns FutureTense/keymaster in the clone,
while Copilot CLI's session store records tykeal/keymaster.

Hướng dẫn đóng góp

Mở hướng dẫn đóng góp

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Hướng nghiên cứu

Bắt đầu bằng cách tái hiện thiết lập fork/upstream và kiểm tra remote.<name>.gh-resolved, sau đó kiểm tra ~/.cache/copilot/pkg/linux-x64/1.0.82/app.js cùng các entry point binding session native sessionResolveRepositorysessionScalarRepositoryName. Theo dõi cách repository được lưu cho một session và cách các panel Issues và Pull requests phân giải nó. Hoàn tất khi repository cơ sở đã cấu hình được các panel tôn trọng mà không thay đổi hành vi push.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Đánh giá

Công nghệ
git, github, shell
Lĩnh vực
cli, developer-experience
Loại issue
Tính năng
Độ khó
4/5
Thời gian dự kiến
3-5 ngày
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Độ rõ ràng
Khá rõ ràng
Mức phù hợp với người mới
48/100

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.