github / github/copilot-cli

Interrupted create_session still creates the session ~1.6 hours later, silently duplicating agent work

オープン
#4,668 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

area:agents area:sessions area:tools
主要言語
Shell
スター
11.2k
フォーク
1.9k
平均マージ
14時間 16分
マージ済み PR(30日)
6

説明

Summary

A create_session tool call was reported to the agent as interrupted (never completed), but the session was actually created and auto-started its kickoff prompt 1 hour 38 minutes later. The agent had correctly treated the call as failed and done the work itself in the meantime, so the late-arriving session became a duplicate worker on the same task, in its own worktree, editing the same files.

The damaging part is not the latency - it is that a side-effecting, non-idempotent tool reported failure and then succeeded anyway, long after the agent had reasonably compensated for the failure.

Evidence from the session event log

Every external_tool.requested in the session has a matching external_tool.completed - except the second create_session, which has no completion event at all:

18:01:18  external_tool.requested    create_session
18:01:44  external_tool.completed              <- 26s, normal
18:02:44  external_tool.requested    get_session
18:02:44  external_tool.completed
...
19:14:44  external_tool.requested    create_session
                                                <- no completion event, ever
21:04:41  external_tool.requested    send_session_message
21:04:41  external_tool.completed

The agent-side tool call surfaced as:

The execution of this tool, or a previous tool was interrupted.

Meanwhile, in the created session's own event log:

20:53:18  session.start           <- 1h38m after the 19:14:44 request
20:53:31  user.message            <- kickoff prompt delivered and executed

So the request at 19:14:44 did eventually take effect at 20:53:18, with no completion ever reported back to the caller.

Impact

  1. Duplicated work. The agent, having been told the call was interrupted, performed the task itself. When the session finally materialised it began the identical task from the identical spec, producing two divergent branches for one issue. Cleaning that up required manually stopping the late session.
  2. Wasted model spend. The duplicate ran autonomously in autopilot until it was noticed and stopped.
  3. No way to detect it. There is no completion, no error, and no handle returned, so the caller has no id to poll and no signal that the request is still pending rather than dead. The only robust workaround an agent has is to poll an out-of-band source (worktree list / session list) after every interrupted side-effecting call - which is not discoverable.

Expected behaviour

Any of the following would resolve it, roughly in order of preference:

  1. Cancel the side effect when the tool call is interrupted. If the result cannot be delivered, the session should not be created.
  2. Return the handle even on interruption, so the caller can poll and either adopt or archive the session.
  3. Make the request idempotent via a caller-supplied key, so a retry cannot create a second session and a late delivery can be reconciled.
  4. At minimum, surface "still pending" distinctly from "failed", so an agent knows not to compensate.

Notes

  • The first create_session in the same session completed normally in 26s, so this is intermittent rather than systemic.
  • Both calls used mode: autopilot with a kickoff prompt, workspace_type: worktree.
  • Client reported itself as github/autopilot.
  • Timestamps above are UTC, from a single continuous session on 2026-08-30.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

調査の方向性

まず、イベントログを再現の証拠として使用し、割り込みが発生した呼び出しの周辺における create_session external_tool.requested と external_tool.completed のライフサイクルを追跡します。最初に成功した create_session および send_session_message の呼び出しと比較します。完了の条件は、副作用のある中断されたリクエストがキャンセルされ、使用可能なハンドルを返し、べき等に調整されるか、セッションを暗黙的に作成するのではなく、保留中であることが明示的に報告されることです。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
shell
領域
cli
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
活発さ
活発
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
45/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。