skillDirectories Does Not Take Effect at Repo Level
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Shell
- Sterne
- 11.2k
- Forks
- 1.9k
- Ø Merge
- 14 Std. 16 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 6
Beschreibung
### Describe the feature or problem you'd like to solve
Working with skills spread across multiple repos or in subdirectories of mono-repos are currently not possible to include without a lot of copying around and cleaning up.
### Proposed solution
Support `skillDirectories` setting both in `.github/copilot/settings.json` and `.github/copilot/settings.local.json` so that we can customise which skills are exposed based on the type of work, the sub-path in a mono-repo and when working across multiple repos. All three scenarios are fairly common in a medium to large enterprise.
### Example prompts or workflows
Let's say I'm working on a frontend-repo and I notice that the backend is not adhering to the contract. I'd like from my frontend-repo to invoke the following skill that lives in backend-repo:
`/investigate-backlog to see if there's a bug on data path of controller Foo where it returns a string instead of a guid`
It wouldn't make sense for me to have it in my user settings since it's dependent upon the type of work I'm doing and the repo I'm currently using. If I duplicate the skill in frontend-repo's .github folder, then I can't be sure when backend folks update something on their end and I get outdated results.
### Additional context
A bit similar to the following issues but not the same IMO:
- #3688
- #3505
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Beginne damit nachzuverfolgen, wie skillDirectories derzeit aus den Benutzereinstellungen gelesen wird und wie Repository-Einstellungen geladen werden. Vergleiche das Verhalten von .github/copilot/settings.json und .github/copilot/settings.local.json, einschließlich Skills in anderen Repositories und Unterverzeichnissen eines Monorepos. Erledigt ist die Aufgabe, wenn beide Dateien auf Repository-Ebene die exponierten Skill-Verzeichnisse anpassen können, ohne Skills zu kopieren.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- shell
- Bereich
- cli, developer-experience
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 48/100