[Rust] Proc macro expansion support
- 主要語言
- CodeQL
- 星號
- 10.1k
- 分支
- 2.1k
- 平均合併
- 2 天 15 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 141
描述
Hello, is there any way or are you planning to implement analysis on expanded proc macros? Im currently trying codeQL on [Anchor](https://crates.io/crates/anchor-lang), which makes heavy use of proc macros.
When running a simple test, I see that by default, codeQL doesn't fully resolve references that exist in the expanded code, meaning i only get a reference to the macro that generated the referenced code, but I dont know which part of the macro is to blame (i used `cargo expand`) to test that. It seems though that placing the expanded file in the root dir does indeed make it be analyzed, but I dont know if this fully supported at the moment.
Is there a better way to do this?
貢獻指南
研究方向
Start with the simple Anchor test described in the issue and use cargo expand to compare the original proc-macro source with the expanded file placed in the repository root. Check how CodeQL resolves references in each case. Done means establishing whether expanded proc macros are supported and documenting a reliable analysis approach or the required implementation scope.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- rust
- 領域
- security
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 需要釐清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100