[Rust] Proc macro expansion support
- Langage dominant
- CodeQL
- Étoiles
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge moyen
- 2 j 15 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 141
Description
Hello, is there any way or are you planning to implement analysis on expanded proc macros? Im currently trying codeQL on [Anchor](https://crates.io/crates/anchor-lang), which makes heavy use of proc macros.
When running a simple test, I see that by default, codeQL doesn't fully resolve references that exist in the expanded code, meaning i only get a reference to the macro that generated the referenced code, but I dont know which part of the macro is to blame (i used `cargo expand`) to test that. It seems though that placing the expanded file in the root dir does indeed make it be analyzed, but I dont know if this fully supported at the moment.
Is there a better way to do this?
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Piste de recherche
Start with the simple Anchor test described in the issue and use cargo expand to compare the original proc-macro source with the expanded file placed in the repository root. Check how CodeQL resolves references in each case. Done means establishing whether expanded proc macros are supported and documenting a reliable analysis approach or the required implementation scope.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- rust
- Domaine
- security
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100