github / github/codeql

How to write a cross-function isAdditionalFlowStep while preserving context sensitive dataflow.

オープン
#19,308 コメント 7 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る
question
主要言語
CodeQL
スター
10.1k
フォーク
2.1k
平均マージ
2日 15時間
マージ済み PR(30日)
141

説明

For example:
```python
import json

def my_dumps(obj):
return json.dumps(obj)
def my_loads(s):
return json.loads(s)

with open('test.json', 'r') as json_file:
json_obj = json.load(json_file)

json_obj = my_loads(my_dumps(json_obj))
json_obj2 = my_loads(my_dumps([1,2,3]))

with open('out.json', 'w') as out:
json.dump(json_obj, out)

with open('out2.json', 'w') as out:
json.dump(json_obj2, out)
```
```CodeQL
import python
import semmle.python.ApiGraphs
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.DataFlow
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.TaintTracking

module TConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig{
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
source = API::builtin("open").getReturn().asSource()
}
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
sink = API::moduleImport("json").getMember("dump").getACall().getArg(0)
}
}

module TFlow = TaintTracking::Global;
import TFlow::PathGraph

from TFlow::PathNode source, TFlow::PathNode sink
where
TFlow::flowPath(source, sink)
select
source.getNode(), source, sink, "root"
```
This works as expected. `json_file` only have a flow to `json.dump(json_obj, out)`.

But when it comes to
```python
import json

def my_dumps(obj):
return json.dumps(obj)
def my_loads(s):
return json.loads(s)

def mock_rpc_call(func_name, arg):
return globals()[func_name](arg)

with open('test.json', 'r') as json_file:
json_obj = json.load(json_file)

json_obj = mock_rpc_call('my_loads', mock_rpc_call('my_dumps', json_obj))
json_obj2 = mock_rpc_call('my_loads', mock_rpc_call('my_dumps', [1,2,3]))

with open('out.json', 'w') as out:
json.dump(json_obj, out)

with open('out2.json', 'w') as out:
json.dump(json_obj2, out)
```
```CodeQL
import python
import semmle.python.ApiGraphs
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.DataFlow
import semmle.python.dataflow.new.TaintTracking

module TConfig implements DataFlow::ConfigSig{
predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
source = API::builtin("open").getReturn().asSource()
}
predicate isAdditionalFlowStep(DataFlow::Node nodeFrom, DataFlow::Node nodeTo) {
nodeFrom.getLocation().getFile() = nodeTo.getLocation().getFile() and (
// Handle call
exists(DataFlow::CallCfgNode rpc_call, FunctionObject rpc_func, FunctionObject called_func|
rpc_func.getName() = "mock_rpc_call" and
rpc_call.getArg(1) = nodeFrom and
rpc_call.getFunction().asCfgNode() = rpc_func.theCallable().getAReference() and
called_func.getName() = rpc_call.getArg(0).asExpr().(StringLiteral).getS() and
called_func.getFunction().getArg(0) = nodeTo.asExpr()
) or
// Handle return
exists(Return ret , DataFlow::CallCfgNode rpc_call, FunctionObject rpc_func|
ret.getValue() = nodeFrom.asExpr() and
ret.getScope().(Function).getFunctionObject().getName() = rpc_call.getArg(0).asExpr().(StringLiteral).getS() and
rpc_call.getFunction().asCfgNode() = rpc_func.theCallable().getAReference() and
rpc_call = nodeTo
)
// How can I match the call and return to preserve context sensitive?
)
}
predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
sink = API::moduleImport("json").getMember("dump").getACall().getArg(0)
}
}

module TFlow = TaintTracking::Global;
import TFlow::PathGraph

from TFlow::PathNode source, TFlow::PathNode sink
where
TFlow::flowPath(source, sink)
select
source.getNode(), source, sink, "root"
```
It will return 4 flow, and 3 of them is context insensitive. `json_file` will have flows to `json.dump(json_obj, out)` and `json.dump(json_obj2, out)`.

コントリビューションガイド

コントリビューションガイドを開く

調査の方向性

Start with the shown CodeQL query and its DataFlow::ConfigSig implementation, especially isAdditionalFlowStep and the CallCfgNode and Return relationships. Trace how the mock_rpc_call examples produce context-insensitive paths and compare those paths with the expected json_obj and json_obj2 flows. Done means the query preserves call and return context and reports only the intended flow to each json.dump call.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

評価

技術スタック
python
領域
security
issue の種類
バグ
難易度
5/5
見積もり時間
1週間以上
活発さ
停滞
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
初心者へのやさしさ
25/100

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。