Missing code injection TP in JavaScript rule
- 主要言語
- CodeQL
- スター
- 10.1k
- フォーク
- 2.1k
- 平均マージ
- 2日 15時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 141
説明
The thing is, if I have this code:
```javascript
JSON.parse = function(text, reviver) {
j = eval("(" + text + ")");
};
JSON.parse(window.location.href);
```
CodeQL reported an alert:
```csv
"Code injection","Interpreting unsanitized user input as code allows a malicious user arbitrary code execution.","error","This code execution depends on a [[""user-provided value""|""relative:///test.js:5:12:5:31""]].","/test.js","3","14","3","29"
```
But if I separate the file saying:
`./lib1.js`:
```javascript
JSON.parse = function(text, reviver) {
j = eval("(" + text + ")");
};
```
`./main.js`
```javascript
require("./lib1");
// JSON.parse = function(text, reviver) {
// j = eval("(" + text + ")");
// };
JSON.parse(window.location.href);
```
I can't get that alert anymore. Why did that happen?
I was using codeql and query pack version release 2.20.4.
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
Reproduce the alert difference using the issue's test.js, lib1.js, and main.js examples with the reported CodeQL query pack version. Then trace the JavaScript rule's handling of assignments and calls across required files; done means identifying whether the missing alert is expected behavior or a cross-file analysis bug and documenting the finding or regression coverage.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- javascript
- 領域
- security
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100