75% vote to change targets
- 主要言語
- 言語のデータがありません
- スター
- 419
- フォーク
- 47
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
説明
I like the 75% steering committee vote. I think you want to keep it to a minimum. Charter absolutely makes sense, and CoC makes sense simply because changes to a CoC can rip a community apart.
I think antitrust and trademark don't need the 75%. Really what they want for changes is "Don't change these unless you know what you're doing", and the same is true for the project's license, notice file, dependency-decisions (based on licensing) etc. Community norms will protect those two files from being unreasonably modified.
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
Review the charter, CoC, antitrust and trademark policies, license, notice file, and dependency decisions referenced in the discussion. Determine which governance changes require a 75% steering committee vote and document the agreed scope; done means the voting rule and its exceptions are explicitly settled.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 領域
- documentation
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100