getsentry / getsentry/sentry-java
Use build-local dir instead of project deps in samples
- Ngôn ngữ chính
- Kotlin
- Star
- 1.4k
- Fork
- 478
- Merge trung bình
- 2 ngày 23 giờ
- Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
- 67
Mô tả
Our Spring Boot + OTel samples currently use project dependencies (e.g. `project(":sentry-opentelemetry:sentry-opentelemetry-bom")`), which:
- Pollutes the buildscript classpath, undermining test isolation
- Makes the samples uncopyable by customers (who won't have project references)
- Masks real compatibility issues (e.g. OTel + Spring Boot version conflicts hidden by the BOM being pulled via project ref rather than a real artifact)
**Proposed change**
Publish SDK artifacts to a build-local Maven directory during CI and configure the samples to resolve from that directory. This preserves per-PR test coverage without the classpath isolation problems of `mavenLocal` (which has shared global state) and without requiring publishing to Maven Central.
**Scope**
- Set up a build-local publish step that outputs to a local directory (e.g. `build/local-repo`)
- Update sample `build.gradle.kts` files to add that local dir as a repository
- Use published coordinates (e.g. `io.sentry:sentry-opentelemetry-bom`) instead of project references in `dependencyManagement`
- Keep samples using released/stable version strings so customers can copy them as-is
**Out of scope**
- Moving samples to Maven Central publishing
- Fully separating samples from test infrastructure (tracked separately)
--
[View Junior Session in Sentry](https://sentry.sentry.io/explore/conversations/slack%3AC089VFRB8N9%3A1783054068.421249/?project=4510944073809921)
Hướng dẫn đóng góp
Hướng nghiên cứu
Start by reading the sample build.gradle.kts files and the CI build configuration that publishes SDK artifacts. Trace the current project dependency and dependencyManagement setup, then verify that samples resolve published coordinates from the build-local directory with stable version strings and that the CI sample tests pass.
Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.
Đánh giá
- Công nghệ
- kotlin, spring-boot
- Lĩnh vực
- build-system, ci-cd
- Loại issue
- Tái cấu trúc
- Độ khó
- 4/5
- Thời gian dự kiến
- 3-5 ngày
- Mức độ hoạt động
- Ít trao đổi
- Độ rõ ràng
- Khá rõ ràng
- Mức phù hợp với người mới
- 52/100