F# Spec doesn't mention private representation Discriminated unions
- Langage dominant
- TeX
- Étoiles
- 311
- Forks
- 291
- Métriques de merge des PR
- Aucune PR mergée en 30 j
Description
For example, in this type:
```
type HtmlAttribute =
private | HtmlAttribute of name:string * value:string
```
What's the effect that `private` should have? I see that in C# projects, I no longer have the `NewHtmlAttribute` constructor, but I can keep doing pattern matching and create new values with `HtmlAttribute("a", "b")` in F#. Is that the intended behaviour? I was expecting to not be able to create new values using the union case constructor, and force people to use a static method that normalizes the arguments
Guide de contribution
Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt
Piste de recherche
Start with the F# language specification and the discriminated-union example in the issue. Determine the documented effect of private on the union representation, including C# constructor visibility, F# pattern matching, and union-case construction; done means the specification clearly states the intended behavior.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- fsharp
- Domaine
- documentation
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100