Credit usage feels much higher than before and harder to sustain for real development work
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Activité
- Calme
- Stack technique
- rust
- Domaine
- cli, developer-experience
Piste de recherche
The report concerns Codex CLI 0.139.0 and credit consumption during audit, fix, and verification workflows; begin by reproducing and measuring comparable workflows against earlier versions. Done would require a concrete, agreed usage-control or predictability change, but this issue names no files, tests, or entry point.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
What variant of Codex are you using?
0.139.0
What feature would you like to see?
I use Codex CLI heavily on a real development project, not just for testing. I use it for debugging, audits, fixes, code review, patching, and verification.
In recent versions, credit consumption feels much higher than before. For similar tasks, credits seem to run out much faster than they did a few versions ago.
This makes Codex harder to use as a stable development tool, especially on larger projects where a normal workflow requires multiple cycles of analysis, patching, and verification.
I am not asking for free usage. I have already purchased and spent a significant amount of credits. The issue is that the current consumption feels too aggressive and difficult to manage during real work.
I would like Codex to provide better control and predictability over credit usage, so independent developers can keep using it seriously without burning through credits too quickly.
Additional information
Codex is extremely useful and I want to keep using it, but the current credit usage feels much less sustainable than before.
The main problem is not paying for the tool. The problem is that, during real development work, credits can disappear very quickly before a complete audit/fix/verification cycle is finished.
This feedback comes from actual day-to-day usage on a complex project.
- Langage dominant
- Rust
- Étoiles
- 125k
- Forks
- 19.5k
- Merge moyen
- 1 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 1k
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de openai/codex
-
enhancement remote
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
-
bug CLI windows-os
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 76/100
-
macOS sandbox blocks hw.optional.arm64 sysctl, causing Flutter to misdetect Apple Silicon as x64 Ouvertebug CLI sandbox
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
-
bug CLI TUI
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 90/100
-
CLI config enhancement skills
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 84/100
Toutes les issues de openai/codex
Issues similaires
-
risk:low runtime status:in-progress type:test
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 92/100
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#11023 ·
-
good first issue refactor
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 86/100
kwakseongjae/auto-hwp#319 ·
-
area:cli bug filter-quality good first issue priority:medium
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 84/100
-
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 72/100
bevyengine/bevy#25861 ·