Credit usage feels much higher than before and harder to sustain for real development work
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- rust
- Área
- cli, developer-experience
Línea de trabajo
The report concerns Codex CLI 0.139.0 and credit consumption during audit, fix, and verification workflows; begin by reproducing and measuring comparable workflows against earlier versions. Done would require a concrete, agreed usage-control or predictability change, but this issue names no files, tests, or entry point.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What variant of Codex are you using?
0.139.0
What feature would you like to see?
I use Codex CLI heavily on a real development project, not just for testing. I use it for debugging, audits, fixes, code review, patching, and verification.
In recent versions, credit consumption feels much higher than before. For similar tasks, credits seem to run out much faster than they did a few versions ago.
This makes Codex harder to use as a stable development tool, especially on larger projects where a normal workflow requires multiple cycles of analysis, patching, and verification.
I am not asking for free usage. I have already purchased and spent a significant amount of credits. The issue is that the current consumption feels too aggressive and difficult to manage during real work.
I would like Codex to provide better control and predictability over credit usage, so independent developers can keep using it seriously without burning through credits too quickly.
Additional information
Codex is extremely useful and I want to keep using it, but the current credit usage feels much less sustainable than before.
The main problem is not paying for the tool. The problem is that, during real development work, credits can disappear very quickly before a complete audit/fix/verification cycle is finished.
This feedback comes from actual day-to-day usage on a complex project.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 125k
- Forks
- 19.5k
- Merge medio
- 1 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 1k
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de openai/codex
-
enhancement remote
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
bug CLI windows-os
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
-
macOS sandbox blocks hw.optional.arm64 sysctl, causing Flutter to misdetect Apple Silicon as x64 Abiertobug CLI sandbox
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
bug CLI TUI
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
-
CLI config enhancement skills
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Todos los issues de openai/codex
Issues similares
-
risk:low runtime status:in-progress type:test
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#11023 ·
-
good first issue refactor
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
EricSpencer00/Resilient#4835 · 1 comentario ·
-
agent:ready documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
cesarferreira/stax#890 ·
-
bug
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100