felixge / felixge/httpsnoop

Start concrete comparison list against other current implementations

オープン
#5 コメント 2 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る
主要言語
Go
スター
1.2k
フォーク
48
PR マージ指標
30日以内にマージされた PR はありません

説明

I really like the education benefit for the community of this project. I think the project has potential to educate router library and middleware authors to make their own implementation more robust and reach higher-quality implementations.
Thus, I would like to suggest a comparison list being added to the readme that outlines current "imperfections"/differences of other major router library providers.

I think a good start would the [https://github.com/pressley/chi](Chi) router and their [https://github.com/pressly/chi/blob/master/middleware/wrap_writer.go](httpFancyWriter) middleware responsewriter. It always looked very complete and modern to me with their support for 1.8 and `http.CloseNotifier`, `http.Flusher`, `http.Hijacker`, `http.Pusher`, and `io.ReaderFrom` interfaces. But now I got sceptical.

I understand this list has potential for blame-gaming but I believe written in an informative and as-neutral-as-possible style it will actually help router and middleware authors to reach higher-quality implementations.

コントリビューションガイド

このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません

評価

この issue はまだ評価されていません。

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。