exercism / exercism/javascript

Windowing System: Improvement Ideas

Aberta
#1,600 4 comentários 0 reações 1 responsável Reivindicada por @SleeplessByte Ver no GitHub
discussion :speech_balloon:
Linguagem predominante
JavaScript
Estrelas
652
Forks
657
Merge médio
19h 37min
PRs com merge (30d)
6

Descrição

After seeing a couple of solutions to "Windowing System" during mentoring, I think the exercise could need some changes to better achieve it's learning objectives.

* For `Position` and `Size`, the constructor and the method have the same implementation. I saw a solution that used the method in the constructor which is not a very typical example.
* There is no reason to use the methods to update values so students often just set the property values directly.
* The calculation for the window resize and move is rather involved which does not add value for the actual learning objectives but it seems students spend quite some time finding creative solutions there, e.g.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12543047/147859416-62818b06-71c5-4558-ba1e-d08cbda753d8.png)

Some ideas how to improve the exercise:
* Maybe we should expect some/all properties to be marked as private with the underscore to discourage the direct assignment. That might also make it easier to pick up unwanted code with the analyzer later. (Not sure how to best test in this case though. Either the test disrespects the underscore which is not a good example or the test needs to fall back on some user-implemented serialization function. But if that function is wrong all the tests will fail which is also annoying as everything else the user did could be correct.)
* The methods on `Position` and `Size` could change the values by some amount instead of just setting a value. That would make them distinct from the constructor. (Probably only needed if we stick with "public properties".)
* Simplify the window resize/move method e.g. by saying some lower bound is always respected

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Avaliação

Esta issue ainda não foi avaliada.

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.