Model serialization drops keys
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con src/glean/api_client/models/documentcontent.py e inspecciona serialize_model; después ejecuta debug.py con documents.json mediante unmarshal_json_response. Se considera terminado cuando el contenido serializado de DocumentContent no está vacío e incluye el campo afectado, tal como comprueban las assertions de debug.py.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
There may be an issue affecting the serialize_model methods of the Pydantic models in this library.
Taking the DocumentContent model as an example, we see:
class DocumentContent(BaseModel):
full_text_list: Annotated[
Optional[List[str]], pydantic.Field(alias="fullTextList")
] = None
r"""The plaintext content of the document."""
@model_serializer(mode="wrap")
def serialize_model(self, handler):
optional_fields = set(["fullTextList"])
serialized = handler(self)
m = {}
for n, f in type(self).model_fields.items():
k = f.alias or n
val = serialized.get(k)
if val != UNSET_SENTINEL:
if val is not None or k not in optional_fields:
m[k] = val
return m
This model uses a field alias that, when constructing the Pydantic object from an API response, will map the fullTextList field of the JSON object to the full_text_list field of the Pydantic object.
However, the model serializer uses:
...
k = f.alias or n
val = serialized.get(k)
...
which means that the field alias (fullTextList) will be used to extract the value rather than the Pydantic field name. This results in value being None and in missing keys in the returned dictionary m when the field name and its alias are different.
To support this claim, please find attached a documents.json file that contains an anonymized response collected from the Glean API (/rest/api/v1/getdocuments endpoint).
And below is a simple debug.py script to run alongside it:
import pathlib
from glean.api_client import models
from glean.api_client.utils.unmarshal_json_response import unmarshal_json_response
class DummyHttpResponse:
def __init__(self, text):
self.status_code = 200
self.text = text
with pathlib.Path("documents.json").open("r") as f:
http_res = DummyHttpResponse(
text=f.read(),
)
documents_response = unmarshal_json_response(models.GetDocumentsResponse, http_res)
assert isinstance(documents_response, models.GetDocumentsResponse)
assert documents_response.documents is not None
assert isinstance(
documents_response.documents["https://company.com/Test"].content,
models.DocumentContent,
)
assert (
documents_response.documents["https://company.com/Test"].content.full_text_list[0]
== "This is a test document."
)
serialized_document_response = documents_response.model_dump()
assert isinstance(serialized_document_response, dict)
assert serialized_document_response["documents"] is not None
# Here's the problem: no `full_text_list` or `fullTextList` in the serialized response!
assert (
len(serialized_document_response["documents"]["https://company.com/Test"]["content"])
> 0
)
Running it yields:
$ ls
debug.py documents.json
$ python debug.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/workspace/app/debug/debug.py", line 40, in <module>
len(serialized_document_response["documents"]["https://company.com/Test"]["content"])
> 0
AssertionError
Note that I'm using:
pydantic_core==2.41.5
pydantic==2.12.5
glean-api-client==0.11.27
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 20
- Forks
- 10
- Merge medio
- 1 d 6 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 17
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de gleanwork/api-client-python
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
gleanwork/api-client-python#136 ·
-
Issue Obtaining Agent Schema Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
gleanwork/api-client-python#137 ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
gleanwork/api-client-python#133 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
gleanwork/api-client-python#115 · 4 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
gleanwork/api-client-python#57 · 2 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de gleanwork/api-client-python
Issues similares
-
link-check link-check:sphinx-theme
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
qgis/QGIS-Documentation#11275 ·
-
bug priority:normal ready-for-dev
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
OpenHands/extensions#626 · 1 comentario ·
-
Change observation tooltip text Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
CSCfi/sd-search-api#39 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100