Rust: query evaluation ~15× slower on 2.26.4 vs 2.26.3 (4 min → 45–60 min, type-inference/data-flow stage)

Abierto
#22,463 3 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
rust

Línea de trabajo

Compara los bundles de CodeQL 2.26.3 y 2.26.4 usando el Rust workspace indicado y revisa los commits 52cbb679, e9bd6988, ce360c4f, 5f76c946 y 1d6ac57d. Recopila la salida de evaluator-log o tuple-counting sugerida si es necesario y determina después si los cambios en callback, rust-analyzer o macro explican la regresión. La tarea estará terminada cuando se identifiquen la causa y un fix compatible o una opción de tuning.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Description of the issue

After the CodeQL bundle moved from 2.26.3 to 2.26.4, Rust analysis of our workspace went from ~4 minutes to ~45–60 minutes per run, with no change on our side. The extra time is almost entirely in query evaluation — the type-inference / data-flow stage — not extraction.

Setup

  • GitHub code scanning default setup (so the bundle version is whatever the action ships; codeql-action v4.37.9 bumped the default bundle to 2.26.4 on 2026-08-26).
  • build-mode: none, ubuntu-latest hosted runner (2 vCPU, CODEQL_THREADS=2, CODEQL_RAM=6914).
  • Private Rust workspace: 15 crates, ~470k lines of Rust (roughly a third of that under tests/), ~720 packages in Cargo.lock, edition 2021. Standard async web-service stack — nothing exotic in the code.
  • The default query suite (36 queries).

What changed / what didn't

We compared the last run on 2.26.3 and the first run on 2.26.4:

  • Same github/codeql-action commit, same runner image.
  • Same commit of our code (identical merge base; no diff at all in Cargo.toml / Cargo.lock).
  • ~150 consecutive runs on 2.26.3 over the preceding four weeks: all 2–4 min. 50+ consecutive runs on 2.26.4 since: all 41–59 min. No overlap.

Timings from the job logs

Stage 2.26.3 2.26.4
total duration (Extract) 12.8 s 59 s
diagnostics/DataFlowConsistencyCounts 2m01s (slowest query) ~30 min
diagnostics/TypeInferenceConsistencyCounts 58 s ~17 min
diagnostics/SsaConsistencyCounts 50 s ~13 min
summary/NodesWithTypeAtLengthLimit < 1 s ~22 min
diagnostics/UnresolvedMacroCalls 6m11s
whole security/* data-flow batch (CWE-089/SqlInjection, CWE-312/CleartextLogging, CWE-319/UseOfHttp, CWE-327/BrokenCryptoAlgorithm, …) well under a minute each ~30 min each (shared batch)

So extraction got ~5× slower but is still small; evaluation of everything downstream of type inference got roughly 15–30× slower.

Suspected cause

Looking at the Rust changes between codeql-cli/v2.26.3 and codeql-cli/v2.26.4, the ones that touch the stage that regressed are:

  • 52cbb679 "Rust: Evaluate mayInvokeCallback in type inference stage"
  • e9bd6988 "Rust: Assume callbacks will be invoked in library functions"
  • the rust-analyzer upgrade to 0.0.328 (ce360c4f, 5f76c946) and the derive-macro expansion restore (1d6ac57d).

The first two look like they widen the call graph feeding type inference, which is consistent with every data-flow query slowing down together. Happy to be corrected — that's inferred from the commit list, not from profiling.

One other difference we noticed in the extractor output on 2.26.4: a handful of new macro expansion failed for '$crate::count' warnings on the metrics crate's counter!-style macros that did not appear on 2.26.3. Possibly unrelated, mentioning it in case it points at the rust-analyzer upgrade.

What would help

  • Is this a known regression in 2.26.4, and is there a tuning knob (e.g. an extractor option, or a way to cap the callback assumption) short of pinning the bundle?
  • If profiling output from a run would help, tell me what to collect (--evaluator-log / --tuple-counting etc.) and I'll attach it.

We can pin codeql-bundle-v2.26.3 via advanced setup in the meantime.

Lenguaje dominante
CodeQL
Estrellas
10.1k
Forks
2.1k
Merge medio
2 d 11 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
129

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de github/codeql

Todos los issues de github/codeql

Issues similares

Más issues de Compilers

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.