envoyproxy / envoyproxy/gateway
Best Practices for Load Shedding in Envoy Gateway
- 主要言語
- Go
- スター
- 3k
- フォーク
- 864
- 平均マージ
- 1日 22時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 148
説明
Hello,
I'm looking for guidance on implementing load shedding in Envoy Gateway to protect backend services under high load.
In networking, mechanisms such as Random Early Detection (RED) and traffic policing proactively prevent congestion by dropping or limiting traffic before the network becomes saturated. I'm looking for the equivalent approach for HTTP/API traffic using Envoy Gateway.
Specifically, I'd like to know:
Does Envoy Gateway support proactive load shedding based on resource pressure (e.g., request latency, concurrency, queue depth, CPU utilization, or other overload signals)?
Is Envoy's adaptive concurrency filter currently supported and configurable through Envoy Gateway?
What is the recommended way to reject excess requests before backend services become overloaded?
Are there best practices for combining:
Local or global rate limiting
Circuit breakers
Adaptive concurrency
Overload Manager
Kubernetes HPA
If some of these capabilities are not yet exposed by Envoy Gateway, what is the recommended production approach today?
Our goal is not only to enforce rate limits, but to gracefully shed load when the platform approaches its safe operating capacity, ensuring that the system remains responsive instead of allowing latency to grow until services become unavailable.
If there are existing examples, documentation, or recommended configuration patterns for this use case, I would greatly appreciate being pointed to them.
Thank you!
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
調査の方向性
Issue では、ファイル、テスト、エントリポイントが特定されていません。まず、Envoy Gateway の既存のドキュメントと、rate limiting、circuit breakers、adaptive concurrency、Overload Manager、Kubernetes HPA に関する設定サポートを確認します。サポートされている機能と、production load shedding に推奨されるアプローチを文書化できれば完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- kubernetes
- 領域
- backend-api-design, networking
- issue の種類
- ドキュメント
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100