eic / eic/tutorial-analysis

Associations need to be used with accounting for weight

Open
#3 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
C
Stars
0
Forks
1
Avg merge
1d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

This is prompted by @bspage912's notes from last tracking meeting https://indico.bnl.gov/event/28056/contributions/107199/attachments/61685/105906/tracksInJets_trackingMeeting_2025-05-08.pdf

https://github.com/eic/tutorial-analysis/blob/801998d6adcddfd33c973c8fab34ee5b99366b66/_episodes/03-analysis.md#efficiency-analysis
https://github.com/eic/tutorial-analysis/blob/801998d6adcddfd33c973c8fab34ee5b99366b66/_episodes/03-analysis.md#efficiency-analysis-1

For most analyses, association with the largest weight should be used, not all possible associations.

Probably warrants a comment in here too:
https://github.com/eic/tutorial-analysis/blob/801998d6adcddfd33c973c8fab34ee5b99366b66/_extras/branch_dictionary.md?plain=1#L61

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with the linked efficiency-analysis sections in _episodes/03-analysis.md, then inspect the referenced location in _extras/branch_dictionary.md. Update the tutorial guidance so associations account for weight and the largest-weight association is used for typical analyses. Done means both relevant documentation locations consistently communicate this guidance.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
55/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.