Associations need to be used with accounting for weight
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
This is prompted by @bspage912's notes from last tracking meeting https://indico.bnl.gov/event/28056/contributions/107199/attachments/61685/105906/tracksInJets_trackingMeeting_2025-05-08.pdf
https://github.com/eic/tutorial-analysis/blob/801998d6adcddfd33c973c8fab34ee5b99366b66/_episodes/03-analysis.md#efficiency-analysis
https://github.com/eic/tutorial-analysis/blob/801998d6adcddfd33c973c8fab34ee5b99366b66/_episodes/03-analysis.md#efficiency-analysis-1
For most analyses, association with the largest weight should be used, not all possible associations.
Probably warrants a comment in here too:
https://github.com/eic/tutorial-analysis/blob/801998d6adcddfd33c973c8fab34ee5b99366b66/_extras/branch_dictionary.md?plain=1#L61
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the linked efficiency-analysis sections in _episodes/03-analysis.md, then inspect the referenced location in _extras/branch_dictionary.md. Update the tutorial guidance so associations account for weight and the largest-weight association is used for typical analyses. Done means both relevant documentation locations consistently communicate this guidance.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100