dry-python / dry-python/returns
Think about typed do-notation
未关闭
enhancement
help wanted
question
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 4.4k
- 派生
- 155
- 平均合并
- 2 小时 27 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 22
描述
I have removed `@pipeline` in `0.14` release.
It had lots of problems:
1. It was not working properly with `Failure` types: #90
2. It had problems with unwrapping complex values like `IOResult` and `FutureResult`
3. It had problems unwrapping containers of different types (you were not allowed to unwrap both `Maybe` and `Result` in the same `@pipeline`
4. It was encouraging imperative code in a functional codebase
I would love to have some solution instead! But, no ideas about how it should work or look like. So, any ideas are welcome.
贡献指南
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。